Canadian tire does not honor their quote

- Still the wrong thread. See Sale of Goods Act.

- Still those two examples: “Repair Only” and “Exchange Only” policies. See Repair only policy.

- Still the "Donate" button and need for credit card infomation on the "Jump Start" site, so it still meets the CT Rep’s definition of a “Faker Advocate" site, and is thus run by the Faker CT Advocates.

- Consumers should still call their Ministry to find out how to get a refund or exchange for a defective product.

- Be sure and check out the growing list of CT Lies at Why Do CT Defenders Post So Many Lies Here?.

- Still the wrong thread.

- Stil two exampes in the SOG thread: "repair only" and "exchange only". Oh, wait: three examples: "No Warranty".

- Still no specifics on lies by consumers, and no evidence against them.

- Still lots of lies from the self-appointed CT Rep.

- Jump Start is still yet another "Faker Advocate" site run by the Faker Advocates at CT, according to the CT definition.

Originally Posted by Unregistered

- Still the wrong thread.

- Stil two exampes in the SOG thread: "repair only" and "exchange only". Oh, wait: three examples: "No Warranty".

- Still no specifics on lies by consumers, and no evidence against them.

- Still lots of lies from the self-appointed CT Rep.

- Jump Start is still yet another "Faker Advocate" site run by the Faker Advocates at CT, according to the CT definition.

Really, three examples where CT or ANY other retailer has been found to have an illegal policy? Really? Please provide the link to the article, or the court findings, or the consumer site, or the BBB warning, or the letter of apology to the millions and millions of customers. BZZZT....doesn't look to exist now does it?

Still the wrong thread.

Plus, some typical CT lies:

- There’s no evidence that this site is affiliated with any other “sucks.com” site.
- No consumer has written that any retailer has been “found” (in any official way) to have an illegal policy” – only that CT has 3 policies that contravene laws in Ontario.

Originally Posted by Unregistered

Still the wrong thread.

Plus, some typical CT lies:

- There’s no evidence that this site is affiliated with any other “sucks.com” site.
- No consumer has written that any retailer has been “found” (in any official way) to have an illegal policy” – only that CT has 3 policies that contravene laws in Ontario.

Ummm..two problems with that "opinion"....1. The point wasn't that this site is affiliated with other sucks.com sites...the point is that with 600 sucks.com sites or more, there are lots of complainers and whiners that will complain about anything and everything. Besides, maybe Parisi does own this site and he's a for profit guy.
2. Of course you haven't found any "official" illegal policy....there isn't any....yet your opinion is still that they do have policies that contravene laws....hilarious! do you hear yourself? Don't see the contradiction in that comment?
Too funny.

- Still the wrong thread.
- It's a lie to say that the existence of other consumer complaints sites means CT doesn't suck.
- It's a lie to say that there aren't laws that CT's policy contravenes.