Ask A Cashier!

CT_CS
no matter what you post here it will never be correct LOL Don't take it personally. You've at some point represented Canadian Tire which means you represent the enemy in the minds of these guys.

I've been at this for many years as a consultant, Service Manager, General Manager and Dealer and they still don't believe anything lol as if they know my business and the rules i'm governed by, better then i do.
Not to worry CT Challenger, CTH8R and DavidLER will tell you everything you need to know about the job you know how to and the company you worked for. They know everything.

Cheers

Originally Posted by CTH8R

"OK, so, like, anything I ever posted? That was like, later proven to be, ya know, totally wrong? I really just meant to give the right answer was all along - whatever that was. You know?"

LMAO!

Well at least I'm good enough to admit that I was wrong.

CTS posted incorrect information, and failed to correct it.

Instead, it was up to a customer to post the correct information for her.

Not a very good job of 'helping' - unless the goal is to help the store keep the customer's money, LOL!

I see consumers are being sarcastically portrayed as know-it-alls, suggesting that they have posted incorrect information.

Yet no evidence of this has been presented on this thread! Pretty funny!

Based on this track record, I'd trust the consumers, over the self-serving employees, any day of the week.

Note: the goal here is to inform consumers, and warn them of the risks of dealing with Crappy Tire. It certainly is NOT to train employees (although the evidence shows they could sure learn a thing or two from the consumers who post here, LOL!)

I am not sarcastic in my portrayal of the few of you that still come here. (H8R, Challenger & LER)
I'm dead serious in my portraly of you as know it all's

You've made it pretty clear over many months, that you think you know the rules and laws that my business is governed by, better then I do, better then my lawyer does, better then 480 other Dealers and better then CT's gang of lawyers in Toronto.

no joke! no joke at all.
YOu really think you're an expert and an advocate. you're not

It must be pretty embarrassing that the Crappy People are proven to be wrong, over and over again, by ordinary consumers.

Especially when they keep claiming (again without any proof) that they are somehow tied to Crappy Tire, and therefore should know better. So sad!

The term "know it all" is indeed an example of sarcasm - something else the Crappy People are wrong about. It suggests that the person is inaccurate. Yet no convincing evidence has been offered.

Nice back-pedalling, though.

There's really nothing wrong with consumers posting truthful statements, and then backing them up. Crappy people would be wise to learn from their example!

But there's plenty wrong with the way Crappy People continue to post dubious statments, then fail to provide any evidence to back up those claims.

(Hey, where's all the evidence you said you had, about every single battery retailer in Canada? Still waiting! Oh, and I guess it needs an update by now, since there must be some new battery retailers to investigate. You'd better get to it!)

And worse than the unsubstantiated claims, are the out-right untruthful statements that Crappy People keep posting, but refusing to recant. Plenty of examples of that.

Nice job, Crappy People!

Very nice indeed!

Originally Posted by Owner 1

YOu really think you're an expert and an advocate

Nope - no consumers ever made those claims.

Only that this information is available to anyone who wants to look for it, and it contradicts the crap the Crappy People want consumers to believe.

The Crappy Person needs to listen closely this time:

We're just ordinary consumers, trying to help each other out, and expose the many false claims of the Crappy People.

Originally Posted by Owner 1

You've made it pretty clear over many months, that you think you know the rules and laws that my business is governed by, better then I do

Consumers have been posting about Onwer 1 for "many months", huh?

Even though they've only been posting as "Owner 1" since mid-November?

Since when does "2" count as "many"??

Unless they've been posting here longer than the 2 months!

So, this is really a confession that "Owner 1" is just CT-Me/LawGuy, posting under yet another name!

Not that this is surprising at all, LOL!