Page 7 of 12 First ... 56789 ... Last
Results 61 to 70 of 111

Thread: Sale of Goods Act

  1. #61
    Posted by an unregistered user Angry CT Guy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    933
    Rep Power
    0

    Re: Sale of Goods Act

    Quote Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
    Man, the ct owner/liars can't even wait for something to be posted before they start telling their lies, and making up things that never happened.

    Then they wonder why nobody trusts them. Big shock when the liars aren't believed. Who saw that coming?

    They are even misrepresenting the posts over at redflag deals, where they can't post their anonymous lies. Nice try though. Do not pass go.

    Already they are pretending that the interpretations of the experts are actually the opinions of just one person. Nice try at a pre-emptive strick.

    Nothing of merit has been ignored - just the obvious lies of the ct store owners who want to defend their attemtps to cheat customers, and to fool customers into thinking they aren't entitled to a refund.

    It shouldn't even be necessary to walk the owner/liars throught the laws - they will just try to continue making up their own versions of the laws anyway.

    It's a good thing customers have the brains to see through ct's scams, and not continue to be the victims of these self-serving liars.

    Great business model. Too bad all the other major retailers have honest, reasonable policies around refunds. CT is the only one trying to pull this scam.

    Here we go again with DavidLer and his multiple personalities saying nothing but the same in the face of adversity. Must be tough to be delusional and schizophrenic.

  2. #62

    Re: Sale of Goods Act

    When the fake ct owner/managers run out a lies, all they have left are insults.

    As if this will convince consumers not to look into things for themselves.

    Or change the laws in Ontario, LOL.

  3. #63
    Posted by an unregistered user CT Me / Lawguy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Posts
    494
    Rep Power
    0

    Re: Sale of Goods Act

    Quote Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
    Man, the ct owner/liars can't even wait for something to be posted before they start telling their lies, and making up things that never happened.

    Then they wonder why nobody trusts them. Big shock when the liars aren't believed. Who saw that coming?

    They are even misrepresenting the posts over at redflag deals, where they can't post their anonymous lies. Nice try though. Do not pass go.

    Already they are pretending that the interpretations of the experts are actually the opinions of just one person. Nice try at a pre-emptive strick.

    Nothing of merit has been ignored - just the obvious lies of the ct store owners who want to defend their attemtps to cheat customers, and to fool customers into thinking they aren't entitled to a refund.

    It shouldn't even be necessary to walk the owner/liars throught the laws - they will just try to continue making up their own versions of the laws anyway.

    It's a good thing customers have the brains to see through ct's scams, and not continue to be the victims of these self-serving liars.

    Great business model. Too bad all the other major retailers have honest, reasonable policies around refunds. CT is the only one trying to pull this scam.
    ahh nice of you to bring up redflagdeals....where Mrs. LER got very little support for her arguments. You tried really really hard to turn atleast two threads into bash CT, and interpret policies and in both only a few agreed, and lots disagreed. You were very cordial and pleasant over there I might add....asking open ended questions, and not hammering home your opinion with a hammer. Perhaps because you realize thats a site FULL of people who know a lot more about retail law then you do and then most of these clowns on here do. You can't push your bullshit in a field full of knowledgeable people....only on here where your supporters are loud mouth no brain yahoo's

  4. #64

    Re: Sale of Goods Act

    Quote Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
    ahh nice of you to bring up redflagdeals
    yeah rfd was brought up to say how the ct reps misrepesent whats been written there - lol

    if anybodys interested feel free to check out what was really written on rfd - not at all what this poster claimed

    this sounds like one of those Fake CT Rep's, who are only here to jack up the view count

    don't forget to donate - make this sites owners more money - LOL

  5. #65
    Posted by an unregistered user Angry CT Guy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    933
    Rep Power
    0

    Re: Sale of Goods Act

    Quote Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
    yeah rfd was brought up to say how the ct reps misrepesent whats been written there - lol

    if anybodys interested feel free to check out what was really written on rfd - not at all what this poster claimed

    this sounds like one of those Fake CT Rep's, who are only here to jack up the view count

    don't forget to donate - make this sites owners more money - LOL

    Yeah, they should read it....would definitely put your lame ass commentary to shame. It's pretty easy to spot a FAKER ADVOCATE these days....you can't quite handle the questions that so easily discredit you....no surprise....fakers are usually called on their lies each and every day by smarter people. Probably why you don't like CTC....they probably caught you in one of your lies.

  6. #66

    Re: Sale of Goods Act

    Quote Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
    Yeah, they should read it....would definitely put your lame ass commentary to shame. It's pretty easy to spot a FAKER ADVOCATE these days....you can't quite handle the questions that so easily discredit you....no surprise....fakers are usually called on their lies each and every day by smarter people. Probably why you don't like CTC....they probably caught you in one of your lies.
    OK, this is sounding like classic 'fake ct rep' stuff, again.

    No legitimate store owner or manager would waste their time posting such pointless garbage.

    I think it's by the prankster, trying to make a parody of real owner/managers.

    That or it's a rep. of the site owners, trying to drive up site traffic to get a share of the ad revenue. "Don't forget to donate! It's right there at the top of the screen! Don't miss the ads at the bottom! Right now it's WagJag - advertisers love traffic!"

    To quote the infamous CT Me, "LOL hilarious".

  7. #67
    Posted by an unregistered user Angry CT Guy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    933
    Rep Power
    0

    Re: Sale of Goods Act

    Quote Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
    OK, this is sounding like classic 'fake ct rep' stuff, again.

    No legitimate store owner or manager would waste their time posting such pointless garbage.

    I think it's by the prankster, trying to make a parody of real owner/managers.

    That or it's a rep. of the site owners, trying to drive up site traffic to get a share of the ad revenue. "Don't forget to donate! It's right there at the top of the screen! Don't miss the ads at the bottom! Right now it's WagJag - advertisers love traffic!"

    To quote the infamous CT Me, "LOL hilarious".

    This goober just gets stupider by the day.
    http://www.2createawebsite.com/money...e-adsense.html

    Get an education loser and try to make something of yourself.

  8. #68

    Re: Sale of Goods Act

    Hey, nobody cares how you get paid, really.

    Maybe you are just 'paid' by making the genuine store owners/managers look really stupid.

    Maybe you get a cut of the site revenue.

    Maybe you are hoping the owner/managers will pay you to stop.

    Don't know, don't care.

    But, hey! Thanks for driving traffic to the site! A little ad revenue would be nice! And maybe some actual donations for the site owner, too!

    Ka-CHING! Help get the word out that CT Sucks! Thank you, Come again!

  9. #69
    Posted by an unregistered user Angry CT Guy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    933
    Rep Power
    0

    Re: Sale of Goods Act

    Quote Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
    Hey, nobody cares how you get paid, really.

    Maybe you are just 'paid' by making the genuine store owners/managers look really stupid.

    Maybe you get a cut of the site revenue.

    Maybe you are hoping the owner/managers will pay you to stop.

    Don't know, don't care.

    But, hey! Thanks for driving traffic to the site! A little ad revenue would be nice! And maybe some actual donations for the site owner, too!

    Ka-CHING! Help get the word out that CT Sucks! Thank you, Come again!

    More ramblings from the mentally ill. Quite sad actually.

  10. #70

    Re: Sale of Goods Act

    Quote Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
    More ramblings from the mentally ill.
    people thought it was sad the fake reps couldn't think up any new lies and resorted to insults

    now they are too lame to think up any new insults

    lol hilarious!

Page 7 of 12 First ... 56789 ... Last

Similar Threads

  1. Returned goods put back on shelf to be resold (to me)
    By Guest-0291 in forum General Canadian Tire Complaints / Chat
    Replies: 38
    Last Post: June 20th, 2014, 10:02 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions