
Originally Posted by
DavidLeR
There have been some fascinating speculations about the compensation received by various posters here.
If I understand correctly, the rocket-scientist store owners/dealers have entered into contracts that don’t allow them to return some defective products to the manufacturers for a refund or even exchange! What a bunch of idiots! This is their plan to make “HUGE coin”?
Imagine the Quality Control that goes into THOSE units! ("Just ship 'em; the stores can't return them")
So, when the unlucky customer shows up at the returns desk, DOA item in hand, what are the owners likely to do?
Grudgingly give the customer back their money, throw the item in the dumpster, and 'eat' the wholesale value?
Arrange for a repair to the item, then sell it as ‘used’ or ‘refurbished’ and take the loss?
No, it is obvious that the greedy owner/dealer would be ‘compensated’ by simply refusing to refund the customer’s money. The store caused the problem, but they want the customer to pay for it.
So CT reps are compensated, at least indirectly, if they can deceive customers into thinking it’s morally OK and actually legal in all provinces for the store to keep the customers’ money, instead of giving a refund.
We continue to see such deceptive behaviour repeatedly from CT Reps on this very thread.
Yes, they are being compensated for the lies they tell customers here.
We know that CTMe was thus directly compensated, and can't help but wonder whether LiarGuy and Unregistered have their own arrangement. They certainly aren't motivated to 'help' any of the customer they so clearly hate.
-----
Bookmarks