Oh, so I guess that proves your policies don't suck, and you aren't a bunch of liars. Yup, you sure laid those false rumours to rest!Originally Posted by Unregistered
Shouldn't that be "disgruntled former" (since I'm still disgruntled, CT genius).
And I'm a disgrunted former customer. Try to keep up.
Well, it turns out they (assuming there's more than one of them) told fewer lies than normal, yesterday! I suppose they mothers are proud, and their bosses are ticked off.
They managed not to re-tell any of the old lies posted at "https://www.canadiantiresucks.net/ge....html#post3772". That's impressive.
And, the only 'put words in the mouth of' one other poster.
As usually, though, when they don't tell lies, they instead stoop to lame insults.
Not nearly as creative as one would hope. Well, today is another day.
Yep, all lies.....like there is no 600 sucks.com sites, covering every major retailer, restaurant and corporations. Just google sucks.com to find out the truth.
Not one example of any credible source saying Canadian Tire has an illegal return policy....don't believe me, then try and find one.
When someone calls me a liar (lame insults), then I like to call them on their own lies...oh yeah, and mention what a loser they are.
Faker advocates on fake advocate sites would not need my credit card info, would not have a disclaimer to the merchantability of this site and wouldn't be looking for donations.
Common sense prevails yet again.
Oh, no! More lies!
And the CT rep's were doing so well with keeping their (assuming there are more that one of them) number of lies down, too. Oh, well. Back to their (or his/her) old tricks again. So disappointing!
Nobody said there are "no 600 sucks.com sites". Typical CT lie.
(But I'm sure the owners appreciate your "donation" by way of your posting and any resulting site traffic.)
Sure, whatever. As long as we all agree that CT sucks.
You know, just because you aren't convinced by the evidence already presented, that doesn't mean that it's a lie. Duh!
Um, the definition of "liar" is making a statement you know isn't true.
For instance, suggesting that someone wrote, "there is no 600 sucks.com sites", when you know that they didn't, is a lie.
So, you are a liar. Check and mate. Not an insult. Not lame. Just a statement of fact.
You are just another (assuming there are more than one) CT Liar.
See, talk about lame insults! Seems to be your default behaviour, when you can't think of another lie to tell.
... Now, I know the following doesn't have anything to do with CT's "Repair Only" policy or anything, but I can't help but be curious about your bizarre conspiracy theory:
Do you maybe mean "Real advocates on real advocate sites would not need my credit card info?".
Or maybe you mean, "Faker advocates on fake advocate sites would need my credit card info."?
At least be coherent in your paranoid babblings.
Just curious: do you perhaps think the End Of Days going to be May 21st?
Oh, and by the way? This site does not "need" your credit card info.
Another lie. You really do seem to have, shall we say, 'only a passing relationship with reality'.
Huh? Why not? Seems pretty reasonable, if you think about it for 30 second.
Lots of advocacy sites have disclaimers just like that. Red Flag Deals. Complaints.com. Unac.org. Other information web sites. ComplaintsBoard has a disclaimer, too.
So, what's your beef, exactly? Why should this particular site be different, LOL?
Lots of advocacy sites ask for donations. Cleft pallet advocates. Literacy advocates. Anti-poverty advocates. Affordable housing advocates. The list goes on.
Yup, that Google thing you suggested sure does turn up a lot of advocates looking for donatons!
I guess they all must be "faker advocates", huh? LOL hilarious!
So, what's your beef, exactly? Why should this particular site be different?
The one thing your posts lack, more than anything else, is 'common sense'.
Just my opinon, though. But based on a LOT of evidence!
No, I won't be donating here.....No, I'm not interested in an e-commerce business...No, I don't believe you when you say you're not a faker advocate.
If the site has a disclaimer to merchantability, don't you think that would be "illegal" under your opinion of the CPA rules? Guess that doesn't match up to your argument, so you avoid it. Nice try though....you lose, loser, you lose.
you are one seriously confused individual
you stopped making any kind of sense long ago
nothing you write is even connected to reality anymore
You seem to be getting called on almost everything you post lately.....probably be best if you could find even one example that mentions CTC's "illegal" return policy.
Seems to be lots more people jumping in to discredit you rather than agree with your misguided opinions.
Huh? Nothing like that is happening. Just the same CT Liars posting more disproven crap. Sorry, you're still wrong. Why not just admit it?
Here’s Part Two of my report into the return policies at Canadian Tire.
I’m trying to answer the following question of pressure washers and lawn mowers bought at Canadian Tire:
Last time, I checked the store web site policy for in-store purchases in Ontario. There was no clear answer on refunds or exchanges for defective items; just a cryptic statement about warranties."If I take it home and it doesn't work, how much time do I have to get a refund?"
In this report, I'll describe my calls to the CT "1-800" customer service number.
-----
2 – Customer Service Line
The “Customer Service” number is 1-800-387-8803.
I spoke with Janice about the Simoniz 2900 and asked her, “If I take it home and it doesn't work, how much time do I have to get a refund?"
She told me that it was "repair only" and therefore “nonrefundable”, so I would not be able to get a refund, even if I brought it back the same day.
Well, so much for an “A” rating. But maybe there's a chance they can get away with just a "B"?
So, I asked, “How much time do I have to exchange it for one that works?”
Janice said, “There are no exchanges on the Simoniz 2900, or on most gas-powered pressure washers”.
Janice volunteered that it could be retuned within 30 days if it was unopened - I guess this is one of the “exceptions” that are not listed on the web site. But if the customer can't find out that it's defective until they open it, then this doesn't really help.An “F” rating for Canadian Tire. “No Refund, No Exchange” on some items.
I then went back to the web site, and did some more checking. That’s when I spotted the “warranty” statements for specific items, and some “exchange only warranty” items.
I called the 1-800 number again, and spoke to Brandon (the first male who answered one of these numbers for any store).
I asked him what the refund policy was for products that are listed on the site as having a “repair only warranty” or “exchange only warranty”.
Brandon told me that the “exchange only” items weren’t refundable, and neither were the ones that say, “repair only”.
So, still an “F - No Refund, No Exchange" for the “repair only” items.
Note that all the others retailers I checked have gotten a grade of “A – Refunds Provided" (for all types of pressure washers and lawn mowers). Every. Single. One. Something to keep in mind when you are deciding where to make your next big purchase.
-----
Next, I’ll report on what I found on Google. The results were very surprising (and not in a good way, if you work for Crappy Tire).
This is ALMOST correct. You stopped short of what happens if it goes to an authorized repair place and it is determined that it truly is defective. If it truly is defective and it is not some tiny part like a carburetor (very rare) then the customer gets a new one.
Most gas powered items (pressure washer, lawnmower, tractor, generator) are not actually defective..the buyer didn't follow the instructions. Do you think a store should cover that as well?
As usual with one sided arguments, you only like to tell almost all of the story.
By the way, who is the number one seller of pressure washers, lawnmowers, and generators in Canada. Hint: it starts with a C and ends with Tire.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks