Page 16 of 25 First ... 61415161718 ... Last
Results 151 to 160 of 249

Thread: Why Do CT Defenders Post So Many Lies Here?

  1. #151

    Re: Why Do CT Defenders Post So Many Lies Here?

    Quote Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
    Actually the saying is BIG hat no cattle..... but I wouldn't expect you to get it right. You're the guy with the hat
    all hat and no cattle - Wiktionary

    "big hat" is listed as an "alternative" - you are probably thinking of the Randy Newman song.

    you seem to think you know a lot - any idea what all these "lies" are that the consumers are supposedly posting?

    any evidence to back any of that up?

    or will it turn out to be just a bunch of crap that can be disprove with a quick Google search, too?

  2. #152
    Posted by an unregistered user Angry CT Guy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    933
    Rep Power
    0

    Re: Why Do CT Defenders Post So Many Lies Here?

    I have been following these threads for awhile now and have searched google as well, but I can't find a reference to Canadian Tire havkng a illegal return policy. Are there no examples?

  3. #153

    Re: Why Do CT Defenders Post So Many Lies Here?

    Quote Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
    I have been following these threads for awhile now and have searched google as well, but I can't find a reference to Canadian Tire havkng a illegal return policy. Are there no examples?
    wrong thread

    try here:

    https://www.canadiantiresucks.net/ge...-exchange.html

    keep that in mind for next time

  4. #154
    Posted by an unregistered user Angry CT Guy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    933
    Rep Power
    0

    Re: Why Do CT Defenders Post So Many Lies Here?

    Quote Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
    wrong thread

    try here:

    https://www.canadiantiresucks.net/ge...-exchange.html

    keep that in mind for next time
    So no examples?

  5. #155

    Re: Why Do CT Defenders Post So Many Lies Here?

    OK, the self-appointed CT Rep is now offering a new explanation, for why they post so many lies here:

    Quote Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
    We're just tired of arguing …
    Huh! It's because they are simply tired!

    But not too tired to stop posting lies, LOL!

    Gee, do you think if they took a day off from posting lies, the CT Rep would be rested up enough to start posting the truth for a change?

  6. #156

    Re: Why Do CT Defenders Post So Many Lies Here?

    Actually, the full explanation from the self-appointed CT Rep, as to why they "Post So Many Lies Here", was:

    Quote Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
    We're just tired of arguing with a loser.
    Is the CT Rep saying that it's OK to tell lies, as long as they also say that a consumer is "a loser"?

    Would they think it's morallly wrong to tell lies if the self-appointed CT Rep had not included "with a loser" in their statement?

    Or do they think it's OK to tell any lie, about anyone, as long as the liar is sufficiently "tired"?

    I supposed the person they are lying about must also be deemed "a loser" for this escape clause to work.

    Yes, it does seem that the CT Rep simply chose to call a consumer "a loser", in order to justify their own dishonesty.

    Another example of blaming the victim - demonize consumers to justify the self-appointed CT rep's own bad actions.

    Not a new strategy - we see this from CT all the time.

    And what about the logic: 'I'm tired, so it's OK for me to post lies'.

    How does that form a defense?

    It would be far better for the fatigued writer to take a break, and come back when you can tell the truth, don't you think, fellow consumers?

    Or how about the self-appointed CT Rep taking some personal responsibility?

    It seems to me the CT Rep has utterly failed to prove that the consumers who post here have erred in any way.

    But instead of graciously admitting defeat, they resort to flat-out lying. (Oh, and petty insults, too.)

    And this is the fault of the consumers???

    Maybe the CT Rep could be more persuasive.

    Maybe they could form better arguments.

    Or provide more compelling facts.

    But instead, they just lie.

    Sounds more lazy than tired.

  7. #157
    Posted by an unregistered user Angry CT Guy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    933
    Rep Power
    0

    Re: Why Do CT Defenders Post So Many Lies Here?

    Quote Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
    Actually, the full explanation from the self-appointed CT Rep, as to why they "Post So Many Lies Here", was:



    Is the CT Rep saying that it's OK to tell lies, as long as they also say that a consumer is "a loser"?

    Would they think it's morallly wrong to tell lies if the self-appointed CT Rep had not included "with a loser" in their statement?

    Or do they think it's OK to tell any lie, about anyone, as long as the liar is sufficiently "tired"?

    I supposed the person they are lying about must also be deemed "a loser" for this escape clause to work.

    Yes, it does seem that the CT Rep simply chose to call a consumer "a loser", in order to justify their own dishonesty.

    Another example of blaming the victim - demonize consumers to justify the self-appointed CT rep's own bad actions.

    Not a new strategy - we see this from CT all the time.

    And what about the logic: 'I'm tired, so it's OK for me to post lies'.

    How does that form a defense?

    It would be far better for the fatigued writer to take a break, and come back when you can tell the truth, don't you think, fellow consumers?

    Or how about the self-appointed CT Rep taking some personal responsibility?

    It seems to me the CT Rep has utterly failed to prove that the consumers who post here have erred in any way.

    But instead of graciously admitting defeat, they resort to flat-out lying. (Oh, and petty insults, too.)

    And this is the fault of the consumers???

    Maybe the CT Rep could be more persuasive.

    Maybe they could form better arguments.

    Or provide more compelling facts.

    But instead, they just lie.

    Sounds more lazy than tired.
    Sounds like someone's meds aren't kicking in this morning. Try to be relevant rather than ranting.

  8. #158

    Re: Why Do CT Defenders Post So Many Lies Here?

    The CT Liar has been extremely busy, lately.

    Apparently this is in retaliation for losing the debate on their 'we need a court case' theory.

    Most of the recent lies have already been enumerated in this post:

    https://www.canadiantiresucks.net/ge....html#post4377

    To summarize, we’ve heard the following CT Lies in the last day or two:

    CT Lie #3 – All other retailers have the “same damn” policy (i.e., no refund for defective items) as Canadian Tire.

    CT Lie #8 – A customer is not entitled to an exchange on a “Repair Only” product.

    CT Lie #9 - A customer is not entitled to a refund for a “Repair Only” or “Exchange Only” product.

    CT Lie #12 – A manufacturer’s warranty is the same thing as a return policy.

    The explanation for why the above are "lies" can be found earlier in this thread.



    I think it’s now time to add a couple of more oft-repeated lies to the list (with the evidence to show that they are lies):

    CT Lie #22 – There are only a few people who have the opinion and interpretation that Ontario consumers are entitled to a refund or exchange for a defective item. None of those people are reliable.

    Numerous, credible sources state that Ontario laws entitles consumers to a refund, or even just an exchange, if they prefer, for defective items. Some of those sources can be found here:

    https://www.canadiantiresucks.net/ge....html#post3613

    CT Lie #23 – Credible evidence is available online to prove Ontario consumers are not entitled to a refund or exchange for a defective item.

    No sites with complete, up-to-date information have been found that state an Ontario consumer is not entitled to a refund or exchange for defective items.

    However, there appear to be additonal laws regarding specific products, such as swimwear, underwear, and electronic media, which may allow a retailer to refuse a refund on specific items.

    CT Lie #24 – The CPA describes retailer obligations regarding the ‘express’ warranties provided by manufacturers.

    The CPA does not mention the express warranties from the manufacturer for consumer goods (other than motor vehicles).

    However, the Act does describe additional, “implied” warranties that apply to the retailer.

    See Consumer Protection Act, 2002, S.O. 2002, c. 30, Sched. A

  9. #159
    Posted by an unregistered user Angry CT Guy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    933
    Rep Power
    0

    Re: Why Do CT Defenders Post So Many Lies Here?

    Quote Originally Posted by CT Challenger View Post
    The CT Liar has been extremely busy, lately.

    Apparently this is in retaliation for losing the debate on their 'we need a court case' theory.

    Most of the recent lies have already been enumerated in this post:

    https://www.canadiantiresucks.net/ge....html#post4377

    To summarize, we’ve heard the following CT Lies in the last day or two:

    CT Lie #3 – All other retailers have the “same damn” policy (i.e., no refund for defective items) as Canadian Tire.

    CT Lie #8 – A customer is not entitled to an exchange on a “Repair Only” product.

    CT Lie #9 - A customer is not entitled to a refund for a “Repair Only” or “Exchange Only” product.

    CT Lie #12 – A manufacturer’s warranty is the same thing as a return policy.

    The explanation for why the above are "lies" can be found earlier in this thread.



    I think it’s now time to add a couple of more oft-repeated lies to the list (with the evidence to show that they are lies):

    CT Lie #22 – There are only a few people who have the opinion and interpretation that Ontario consumers are entitled to a refund or exchange for a defective item. None of those people are reliable.

    Numerous, credible sources state that Ontario laws entitles consumers to a refund, or even just an exchange, if they prefer, for defective items. Some of those sources can be found here:

    https://www.canadiantiresucks.net/ge....html#post3613

    CT Lie #23 – Credible evidence is available online to prove Ontario consumers are not entitled to a refund or exchange for a defective item.

    No sites with complete, up-to-date information have been found that state an Ontario consumer is not entitled to a refund or exchange for defective items.

    However, there appear to be additonal laws regarding specific products, such as swimwear, underwear, and electronic media, which may allow a retailer to refuse a refund on specific items.

    CT Lie #24 – The CPA describes retailer obligations regarding the ‘express’ warranties provided by manufacturers.

    The CPA does not mention the express warranties from the manufacturer for consumer goods (other than motor vehicles).

    However, the Act does describe additional, “implied” warranties that apply to the retailer.

    See Consumer Protection Act, 2002, S.O. 2002, c. 30, Sched. A
    So all this time, and still no examples? Tsk, tsk....faker advocate.

  10. #160

    Re: Why Do CT Defenders Post So Many Lies Here?

    Quote Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
    So all this time, and still no examples? Tsk, tsk....faker advocate.
    Nope, this isn't the right thread, either, CT moron.

    Try this one instead, for the examples of "Repair Only" and "Exchange Only" - lots of convincing evidence to be found there:

    https://www.canadiantiresucks.net/ge...goods-act.html

    You might also be interest in the the Jump Start site - according to the CT Rep, it's also a "faker advocate" site - you might be interested in sharing your insights over there, too.

Page 16 of 25 First ... 61415161718 ... Last

Similar Threads

  1. How to post a new thread Tutorial
    By Admin in forum New to this site?
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: December 27th, 2010, 03:39 PM
  2. Replies: 2
    Last Post: January 31st, 2008, 12:00 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions