Page 21 of 25 First ... 111920212223 ... Last
Results 201 to 210 of 249

Thread: Why Do CT Defenders Post So Many Lies Here?

  1. #201

    Re: Why Do CT Defenders Post So Many Lies Here?

    It’s pretty clear that the people who run CT suck, too.

    Just look at the of anti-consumer, anti-society crap they routinely post here.

    They don’t like customers, especially ones who want them to be honest and accurate in what they say, both in stores and on this site.

    They don’t like consumers, especially ones who point out their constant lies, mis-stated policies, and how much better other stores are.

    They don’t like their own employees, especially ones who tell the truth about how they run their stores.

    They don’t like people with illnesses or disabilities, and want to stimatize them in society.

    They don’t like unions, or really any people who try to help one-another. Especially, they don’t like “advocates”, whom they say are “fakers".

    Plus the people at CT tell lie after lie, day after day.

    Lies about what consumers wrote, lies about the policies of their own stores, lies about the policies of other stores, and lies about what people at Consumer’s Ministries say.

    And they've admitted here that "it's about profit, make no mistake" and "yah, i’m greedy".

    So, I think we’ve solved the mystery of 'Why Does CT Suck So Much?'

    CT sucks, because the people who run it suck!

  2. #202
    Posted by an unregistered user CT Me / Lawguy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Posts
    494
    Rep Power
    0

    Re: Why Do CT Defenders Post So Many Lies Here?

    Quote Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
    So typical of CT.


    The Canadian public is upset with their cruel stance on staff and managers with mental illness?
    Nothing wrong with CT - Canadians are just a bunch of “whiners”.

    Customers are unhappy about CT hiding their crappy policies, and springing them on innocent customers who just want fair treatment? Customers are just too demanding – “Get the f’ out of my store”.

    The examples continue.

    Hint: legitimate complaints are an opportunity for the store to improve.
    The Canadian Public? You speak for the Canadian public as a whole do you? You certainly don't speak for the public who spent $25,000 at my store yesterday on a rainy Wednesday. They seemed to speak for themselves actually

    Hint: you are correct LEGITIMATE complaints are an opportunity for a store to improve. Most of what's posted on here is not legitimate. Complaints yes. from constant complainers YES. People with an objective opinion willing to look at all options DEFINITELY NO.

    A legitimate complaint is NOT, you are breaking the law by repairing that pressure washer. - sorry not interested
    A legitimate complaint is NOT, I as a customer can choose how my warranty is dealt with, not you, the seller and provider of the warranty - sorry still not interested
    A legitimate complaint is NOT - my car was absolutely perfect, without flaw when it came into your shop, now it won't run, has 2 flat tires and a rip in the seat. - Ummmmmm no

    HappY Thursday
    Don't forget to browse your new flyer

  3. #203
    Posted by an unregistered user Guest-0477's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    73
    Rep Power
    0

    Re: Why Do CT Defenders Post So Many Lies Here?

    I love it when the self-appointed CT rep gets ‘all riled up’.

    I've noticed that consumers only get “riled up” when the CT Rep posts lies, or behaves in outrageous ways, like making fun of people with illnesses or disabilities.

    But it's hard to miss the fact that CT only gets ‘riled up’ when consumers post the truth about what Crappy Tire and its self-appointed Rep have been up to.

    Luckily, their responses to being called on their despicable actions are very predictable:

    - Tell more lies (like a customer has to settle for a repair, and not the legally required refund or exchange).
    - Pretend that a store's return policy and a manufacturer's warranty are the same thing.
    - Blame the customers for problems the store created.

    The insults towards consumers should be starting shortly :-)

    Yes, we've heard from them, loudly and clearly, that there's only one thing that matters to them:

    $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$

    Indeed, "Profit Before Truth" is their true motto.

  4. #204
    Posted by an unregistered user Angry CT Guy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    933
    Rep Power
    0

    Re: Why Do CT Defenders Post So Many Lies Here?

    How you making out with that call to Ellen Roseman?
    How about W5?
    A lawyer?
    A media source?

    Faker advocate must not believe the lies he posts. Don't forget to donate...lol

  5. #205

    Re: Why Do CT Defenders Post So Many Lies Here?

    Well, not so many lies about what consumers have written, lately.

    No, the CT Liar has decided instead to dig back into their big bag of lies about consumer law, and pull out some of the old classics:

    CT Law Lie #8 – A customer is not entitled to an exchange on a “Repair Only” product.

    CT Law Lie #9 - A customer is not entitled to a refund for a “Repair Only” or “Exchange Only” product.

    CT Site Lie #11 – There’s a BBB site quotes the Business Practices Act, and it says that it’s OK for a store to repair an item instead of giving a refund.

    CT Retail Lie #12 – A manufacturer’s warranty is the same thing as a return policy.

    CT Store Lie #15 - The products CT sells are not actually defective - customers don't know the product, or want “a free rental”.

    CT Store Lie #16 – People who want to return defective products are trying to defraud the store.

    CT Law Lie #23 – There is credible evidence available online that proves Ontario consumers are not entiled to a refund or exchange for a defective item – it is completely at the discretion of the retailer.

    I guess we'll just have to wait a bit, to hear the other 17 lies be trotted out once again, too ...

  6. #206
    Posted by an unregistered user Angry CT Guy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    933
    Rep Power
    0

    Arrow Re: Why Do CT Defenders Post So Many Lies Here?

    can I call it or what....guess we won't be seeing any media articles about illegal return policies after all...lmao

    Not sure why the Ministry of Consumer Services link was broken, but I'll try again.....even though faker advocate will call it misstated or lies:

    Refunds, Exchanges and Deposits

    What would the ministry know? I have an idea....you should call them and get the truth about faker advocates opinion. Would be the number ONE reason that he hasn't called the media, Ellen Roseman, started a lawsuit, .....yes, he borders on the ridiculous, no matter which alter ego he posts under.

  7. #207
    Senior Member CTH8R's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    5,320
    Blog Entries
    1
    Rep Power
    15

    Re: Why Do CT Defenders Post So Many Lies Here?

    Quote Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
    can I call it or what....
    Uh, the CT rep seems pretty confused. Not uncommon for them, LOL.

    I do believe they meant to reply to a post that's waaaaaay over heeeeere: Returning Unwanted Goods - CT Has the Worst Policies

    And they think they called something, huh?

    Here's the formula for next time:

    1 - Find a statement that's already been disproven (like, a site that references obsolete legislation).
    2 - Post the same, old, tired link, claiming it's relevant.
    3 - Add a 'prediction' that someone will say 'Hey! That's the same old, tired link to obsolete legislation!').
    4 - Gloat absurdly, as if you've 'won', when an alert consumer (predicatably) writes, 'Hey! That's the same old, tired link to obsolete legislation!'.

    Yes, the CT geniuses have stumped only themselves, LOL!

    Oh, but thanks for fixing your broken link, genius.

    Too bad it's only about returns of 'unwanted' items - a point that was long ago conceeded .... waaaaaay over heeeeere: Returning Unwanted Goods - CT Has the Worst Policies

    Also too bad that it's off-topic for defective or unfit items - but have a look at this post for some interesting reading. Government of Ontario, law professor, law students, Ellen Roseman, and so forth. About 15 or 16 of them at Sale of Goods Act.

    But, feel free to chase down all those leads you mentioned, to see if you can disprove any of the information already posted.

    In the meantime, consumers have all the informtion they need to get the refunds or exchanges they are entitled to, regardless of the policies CT might try to force on them.

    Happy Lying!

  8. #208
    Posted by an unregistered user Angry CT Guy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    933
    Rep Power
    0

    Re: Why Do CT Defenders Post So Many Lies Here?

    Quote Originally Posted by CTH8R View Post
    Uh, the CT rep seems pretty confused. Not uncommon for them, LOL.

    I do believe they meant to reply to a post that's waaaaaay over heeeeere: Returning Unwanted Goods - CT Has the Worst Policies

    And they think they called something, huh?

    Here's the formula for next time:

    1 - Find a statement that's already been disproven (like, a site that references obsolete legislation).
    2 - Post the same, old, tired link, claiming it's relevant.
    3 - Add a 'prediction' that someone will say 'Hey! That's the same old, tired link to obsolete legislation!').
    4 - Gloat absurdly, as if you've 'won', when an alert consumer (predicatably) writes, 'Hey! That's the same old, tired link to obsolete legislation!'.

    Yes, the CT geniuses have stumped only themselves, LOL!

    Oh, but thanks for fixing your broken link, genius.

    Too bad it's only about returns of 'unwanted' items - a point that was long ago conceeded .... waaaaaay over heeeeere: Returning Unwanted Goods - CT Has the Worst Policies

    Also too bad that it's off-topic for defective or unfit items - but have a look at this post for some interesting reading. Government of Ontario, law professor, law students, Ellen Roseman, and so forth. About 15 or 16 of them at Sale of Goods Act.

    But, feel free to chase down all those leads you mentioned, to see if you can disprove any of the information already posted.

    In the meantime, consumers have all the informtion they need to get the refunds or exchanges they are entitled to, regardless of the policies CT might try to force on them.

    Happy Lying!
    Obsolete Legislation? You keep saying that but I guess you didn't scroll to the bottom to see - last updated June 13, 2011....lmao. Your right though, why should we believe the actual Ministry when we have your lies to rely on....too funny. How you making out with some credible person to mention how illegal our policies are....or maybe ANY other retailer.....hilarious!

  9. #209

    Re: Why Do CT Defenders Post So Many Lies Here?

    Quote Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
    Obsolete Legislation? You keep saying that but I guess you didn't scroll to the bottom to see - last updated June 13, 2011....lmao. Your right though, why should we believe the actual Ministry when we have your lies to rely on....too funny. How you making out with some credible person to mention how illegal our policies are....or maybe ANY other retailer.....hilarious!
    The CT Liars are easily confused, I see.

    They have trouble telling the difference between the date a web site was updated, and the date the legislation was updated.

    The BPA was replaced in 2005. Even though the web site was updated in 2011, it still references this out-dated legislation.

    This was already pointed out as a recurring CT lie, back in May: Why Do CT Defenders Post So Many Lies Here?

    "#11 – There’s a BBB site that references the Business Practices Act, and it says that it’s OK for a store to repair an item instead of giving a refund. The site in question references out-dated information. The BPA was replaced by the CPA in 2005. See CanLII - Business Practices Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. B.18 for details. (And the site is not clear on whether, under the old laws, the customer used to be able to can choose the remedy, or the store used to be able to choose.) "

    In fact, this whole discussion is just a re-run:

    "Repair Only Warranty" - No Refund, No Exchange

    Are we going to have this come up every month??

  10. #210

    Re: Why Do CT Defenders Post So Many Lies Here?

    The prolific output of the self-appointed CT Rep in itself belies the very claims they make on this site:

    - The CT rep says that this site makes no difference. Yet, they post here most days, and they post more than once. Could it be that the CT rep has figured out that this site really DOES make a difference?
    - The CT rep says that only a few people read this site, yet there are many hundreds of views every day.
    - The CT rep posts lie after lie, yet claims to be honest and truthful. Should we believe them?
    - The CT rep says they want to save the environment by refusing returns - yet they make money by refusing returns.
    - The CT rep says they want to save customers embarrassment and frustration by telling customers the SGA and CPA don't apply. But aren't they just keeping out money?

    Yes, it really does make one wonder, if all this output by them is designed to save customers from themselves, or just save the stores money.

Page 21 of 25 First ... 111920212223 ... Last

Similar Threads

  1. How to post a new thread Tutorial
    By Admin in forum New to this site?
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: December 27th, 2010, 03:39 PM
  2. Replies: 2
    Last Post: January 31st, 2008, 12:00 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions