You know i dont buy any of this 'oh i'm a big-shot dealer' stuff
For one thing wtf are they doing on this goofy site on a friday night - arent they supposed to be rich?
Hire some kid to do it for you LOL!
Plus if they were a dealer for real theyd know this stuff already and not be seeking opinions on here
Hey i did a little searching on here for the word 'expert'
Nobody seems to be stepping up and saying, oh i'm this big expert
Just the opposite, oh i'm no expert. Just other people saying, oh youre such an expert, tell me such and such
Plus i think this so called dealer is the one who writes 'you lose loser'
Not executive material LOL
So i just not feeling this person as a for real dealer
Maybe their kid or something
We never did find out why the CTers post so many lies here.
Strange way to run a business.
sure we did
the 'loser loser loses' guy is ticked off because someone wrote that things that are against the law are illegal
and that the ct's repair only policy is against the law
somehow being ticked off at people is a good enough reason to tell lies for months on end
i suspect the sheer joy of being annoying is a factor too
not really rocket science
agreed - trying to protect the store's reputation, but making the dealers look like a bunch of crack-pot liars
not the best pr move.
These Canadian Tire people are disgusting.
They tell one lie after another, without regard to the truth - just whatever they feel like saying at the time.
There lies aren't even very consistent either.
Returns don't cost us any money, they say repeatedly. Then its, "costs are kept down on needless returns". No regard for the truth at all.
When people point this out, they tell even more lies, otfen about the person who blew the whistle on them.
If that doesnt' silence their critics they bring out the personal insult hoping to intimidate them.
The CT people say they aren't convinced of what the law says? Fine let the live in denial.
The customers only need enough information to get them started in the right direction. There's plenty of that, thanks to my fellow consumers on this and other site. Oh, and published articles in newspapers and on consumer sites.
CT is being represented by crack pot liars
That sums them up pretty well.
quoted from teh CPA, i might suggest looking at the header of the section you found that under. It's called FUTURE CONTRACTS.
Like you agree to have a kitchen installed or house built or something.... and change your mind. you can cancel a FUTURE contract and receive your money back ....
you can cancel a FUTURE contract and receive your money back.
Not one that's already been completed. future contract. drill that into your head, .
I just love it when the stupid CT liars post their lies right here on the "CT Defenders Post Lies" thread.
It's so much more convenient for any consumers to pick away at.
Take this batch of lies, for example:
Let's start with the most obvious and easily disproven lie: there is NO SUCH THING in the CPA as a "FUTURE CONTRACT"!
These dumb CT Liars can't even QUOTE the law accurately, let alone interpret it!
Just search "Consumer Protection Act, 2002, S.O. 2002, c. 30, Sched. A" for that term - you won't find it.
Oh, then, gee, where do we find "the section" that talks about "cancelling" or "cancellation"?
Well, how about we search the REST of the TABLE OF CONTENTS, huh?
23 - Cancelling future performance agreements"
I can hear their tiny mental wheels turning: "I'm a CT Liar. Look what I found! I don't need to read any more. I'll just jump right onto CT Sucks, and shoot my mouth off about how wrong everybody else is!"
But guess what? If you BOTHER to SCROLL DOWN a few lines, you'll find the following sections also cover "Cancel":
28 - Time Share Agreements
35 - Personal Development Services
40 - Internet Agreements
43 - Direct Agreements
47 - Remote Agreements
And here's an interesting one:
94 - Cancellation.
Holy Crap! Look at all the stuff the CT Genius managed to miss! And mis-interpret!
And that's just the friggin' Table of Contents that they couldn't comprehend!
Well, Bravo, Mr. CT Dumb-ass.
You've only proven yourself, once more, to be an incompetent liar.
And how about all the bandwidth the customer-hating CT Liars wasted, complaining about "interpretations" by others?
Seems pretty ironic now.
Well, at least you managed to get that right. Too bad it's irrelevant - LOL Hilarious!
Ha-ha!
The only thing that needs drilling is YOUR head, CT Liar!
You might want to check out the rest of the Act, especially Section 94 called "Cancellation", where it talks about (have you guessed it yet???) ..... "Cancellation"!
Not that I'm going bother 'interpreting' anything for you - there are already 14 reputable sites where that's been done for us.
Far safer to trust any one of those sites, over the dumb and disreputable CT Liars.
But you know what? This same lie was already thoroughly disproven, a few weeks ago, in this thread:
"https://www.canadiantiresucks.net/c...-chilliwack-bc/664-store-credit.html#post3618"
Sound like another one to add to the "Frequent Liars Club".
Oh, but when you finally get around to reading past the TABLE of CONTENTS, kindly keep your stupid mis-interpretations and lies to yourself.
It'll be less embarrassing for you, that way.
The CT Liar (we only know for sure there’s one) was actually not very productive this past weekend.
Mostly he/she only offered the usual, desperate attempts to convince Canadian Consumers that:
- proof isn’t really proof
- experts aren’t really experts
- advocates aren’t really advocates
- credible sources are not credible
- the CT Liar’s opinion is the only one that’s correct
- it’s OK for stores to sell junk, and not follow the law.
- their policies aren’t the worst of any major retailer.
The main focus was a re-telling of Lie #9: A customer is not entitled to a refund for a “Repair Only” or “Exchange Only” product.
( Guess this needs updating to include the many "No Warranty" products, too.)
The list of references that CT doesn’t want Consumers to believe are here:
"https://www.canadiantiresucks.net/g...aints-chat/707-sale-goods-act-6.html#post3613"
The only real surprise was when the CT Liar decided out of the blue to break his/her own rule & start offering personal mis-interpretations on the CPA.
This nonsense was thoroughly debunked (for the second time).
Just to make things easier, we'll now track this as:
Lie #18 – The CPA does not apply to ordinary retail transactions.
The proof can be found here:
"https://www.canadiantiresucks.net/g...enders-post-so-many-lies-here-7.html#post3959"
And here:
"https://www.canadiantiresucks.net/c...-chilliwack-bc/664-store-credit.html#post3618"
There was a lot of stuff posted about other stores. We haven’t really heard back on how many lies are contained in those posts (not that they really matter).
However, a quick check on the Future Shop site, and found a typical CT lie right away:
“
There was also the claim that “in lots of cases” CTC’s policies “are better” than other store’s policies.
For Costco, Walmart and Home Depot, all return policies surveyed so far have been better than at CTC.
Perhaps the CT Liar would care to provide some verifiable evidence that this is true? Otherwise, this will be held for consideration as an Offical CT Lie.
And why don't they provide evidence? Just more laziness? Are they getting bored of fabriating phoney "proof"? Because there isn't any?
We'll just have to wait and see what lies the concoct this week.
"Friends Don't Let Friends Shop at Canadian Tire"
Two questions, not a single answer to either one of them
Not one of you could step up to say how they are viewed according to CPA and SGA according to your interpretation. I even gave you three days while I was away travelling again and all you could do was call us liars lol
I thought it was obvious from the site's name, but the CT Liars haven't figured out yet that this isn't some kind of "help line" for stores to get ideas on how to continue ripping off customers.
In fact, we are just a bunch of ordinary consumers, supporting one-another, and sharing information that's helpful to us.
Nobody can stop these jerks from posting their lies and BS here, but that doesn't mean we have to so their research for them, or even pay attention to their bogus questions.
The CT Liar (we only know for sure there’s one) was actually not very productive this past weekend.
Mostly he/she only offered the usual, desperate attempts to convince Canadian Consumers that:
- proof isn’t really proof
- experts aren’t really experts
- advocates aren’t really advocates
- credible sources are not credible
- the CT Liar’s opinion is the only one that’s correct
- it’s OK for stores to sell junk, and not follow the law.
- their policies aren’t the worst of any major retailer.
The main focus was a re-telling of Lie #9: A customer is not entitled to a refund for a “Repair Only” or “Exchange Only” product.
( Guess this needs updating to include the many "No Warranty" products, too.)
The list of references that CT doesn’t want Consumers to believe are here:
"https://www.canadiantiresucks.net/g...aints-chat/707-sale-goods-act-6.html#post3613"
The only real surprise was when the CT Liar decided out of the blue to break his/her own rule & start offering personal mis-interpretations on the CPA.
This nonsense was thoroughly debunked (for the second time).
Just to make things easier, we'll now track this as:
Lie #18 – The CPA does not apply to ordinary retail transactions.
The proof can be found here:
"https://www.canadiantiresucks.net/g...enders-post-so-many-lies-here-7.html#post3959"
And here:
"https://www.canadiantiresucks.net/c...-chilliwack-bc/664-store-credit.html#post3618"
There was a lot of stuff posted about other stores. We haven’t really heard back on how many lies are contained in those posts (not that they really matter).
However, a quick check on the Future Shop site, and found a typical CT lie right away:
“Future Shop & Best Buy return policy states No returns on DVD's, movies, CD's etc”
If you check for yourself, you’ll see that an exchange is allowed, which is a type of return.
There was also the claim that “in lots of cases” CTC’s policies “are better” than other store’s policies.
For Costco, Walmart and Home Depot, all return policies surveyed so far have been better than at CTC.
Perhaps the CT Liar would care to provide some verifiable evidence that this is true? Otherwise, this will be held for consideration as an Offical CT Lie.
And why don't they provide evidence? Just more laziness? Are they getting bored of fabriating phoney "proof"? Because there isn't any?
We'll just have to wait and see what lies the concoct this week.
"Friends Don't Let Friends Shop at Canadian Tire"
Two questions, not a single answer to either one of them
I thought it was obvious from the site's name, but the CT Liars haven't figured out yet that this isn't some kind of "help line" for stores to get ideas on how to continue ripping off customers.
In fact, we are just a bunch of ordinary consumers, supporting one-another, and sharing information that's helpful to us.
Nobody can stop these jerks from posting their lies and BS here, but that doesn't mean we have to so their research for them, or even pay attention to their bogus questions.
I don't want or need you to do any research on my behalf. We also have no issues with you 'supporting' one another. However in order to be of REAL support, you must be accurate, factual and truthful otherwise you're going to lead these customers you're trying to "support" down a path that will piss them off more.
Nice way around answering the question though.
how do DVD's and major appliances get protected by the CPA when it clearly states in the returns and warranties websites for the retailers mentioned, no returns?
answer
Two questions, not a single answer to either one of them
I thought it was obvious from the site's name, but the CT Liars haven't figured out yet that this isn't some kind of "help line" for stores to get ideas on how to continue ripping off customers.
In fact, we are just a bunch of ordinary consumers, supporting one-another, and sharing information that's helpful to us.
Nobody can stop these jerks from posting their lies and BS here, but that doesn't mean we have to so their research for them, or even pay attention to their bogus questions.
Of course you don't have to answer the questions that PROVE you wrong.....that would make you an OBVIOUS faker advocate....no worries though, you get called on your stupidity each and every day. Don't forget to donate....box and paypal link found right at the top.