Page 7 of 25 First ... 5678917 ... Last
Results 61 to 70 of 249

Thread: Why Do CT Defenders Post So Many Lies Here?

  1. #61
    Posted by an unregistered user Angry CT Guy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    933
    Rep Power
    0

    Re: Why Do CT Defenders Post So Many Lies Here?

    Quote Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
    You know i dont buy any of this 'oh i'm a big-shot dealer' stuff

    For one thing wtf are they doing on this goofy site on a friday night - arent they supposed to be rich?

    Hire some kid to do it for you LOL!

    Plus if they were a dealer for real theyd know this stuff already and not be seeking opinions on here

    Hey i did a little searching on here for the word 'expert'

    Nobody seems to be stepping up and saying, oh i'm this big expert

    Just the opposite, oh i'm no expert. Just other people saying, oh youre such an expert, tell me such and such

    Plus i think this so called dealer is the one who writes 'you lose loser'

    Not executive material LOL

    So i just not feeling this person as a for real dealer

    Maybe their kid or something

    There's at least one other dealer other than me that posts on this site and I don't feel bad for calling people losers when they try to pass their opinions off as truths, purposely mislead people and offer no value whatsoever on here. For the record 1042 customers today and an average sale of $44.27....do the math and see how rich I'm getting. I pay people to do the work, so I have lots of time to debunk faker advocates.

  2. #62

    Re: Why Do CT Defenders Post So Many Lies Here?

    We never did find out why the CTers post so many lies here.

    Why wouldn't they just be honest about what people wrote, instead of twisting others words?

    Why wouldn't they just be honest about their own policies? About the policies of other stores?

    If they are being honest now about something, nobody is going to believe them, having been lied to too many times.

    Strange way to run a business. Assuming anybody believes they run a business!

  3. #63

    Re: Why Do CT Defenders Post So Many Lies Here?

    Quote Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
    We never did find out why the CTers post so many lies here.
    sure we did

    the 'loser loser loses' guy is ticked off because someone wrote that things that are against the law are illegal

    and that the ct's repair only policy is against the law

    somehow being ticked off at people is a good enough reason to tell lies for months on end

    i suspect the sheer joy of being annoying is a factor too

    not really rocket science

    Quote Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
    Strange way to run a business.
    agreed - trying to protect the store's reputation, but making the dealers look like a bunch of crack-pot liars

    not the best pr move.

  4. #64
    Canadian Consumers
    Guest Canadian Consumers's Avatar

    Re: Why Do CT Defenders Post So Many Lies Here?

    We’ve been down this road before. In February, I think.

    If the CT Reps don’t like the web sites that say a consumer is entitled to a refund for a defective item, then the Reps should contact those sites, and present their “proof”.

    A list of sites is provided for their convenience, here:

    https://www.canadiantiresucks.net/ge....html#post3613

    Once those sites are updated, we can remove them from the list.

    Until then, it’s a waste of time for CT Reps to debate these issue with consumers here. We’ve learned not to trust what the CT Reps claim. We know that CT has a financial stake in this.

    In the meantime, we consumers can do our own research, and make up our own minds.

    So, let us know when those sites are updated!

    Regards,

    Canadian Consumers

  5. #65
    Posted by an unregistered user Angry CT Guy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    933
    Rep Power
    0

    Re: Why Do CT Defenders Post So Many Lies Here?

    Quote Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
    sure we did

    the 'loser loser loses' guy is ticked off because someone wrote that things that are against the law are illegal

    and that the ct's repair only policy is against the law

    somehow being ticked off at people is a good enough reason to tell lies for months on end

    i suspect the sheer joy of being annoying is a factor too

    not really rocket science



    agreed - trying to protect the store's reputation, but making the dealers look like a bunch of crack-pot liars

    not the best pr move.

    I gather that you don't like someone challenging your wrong opinions. Call me a liar all you want, but you have been asked to provide people with REAL proof and you can't do it. See, pretender faker advocates are easily exposed. Ignore all the evidence posted or the knowledge of those that have more intelligence than you....it still won't make your opinion any more valid.
    My favorite quote for you is.....wait for it.....you lose, loser, you lose!

  6. #66
    Fed Up Consumer
    Guest Fed Up Consumer's Avatar

    Re: Why Do CT Defenders Post So Many Lies Here?

    These Canadian Tire people are disgusting.

    They tell one lie after another, without regard to the truth - just whatever they feel like saying at the time.

    There lies aren't even very consistent either.

    Returns don't cost us any money, they say repeatedly. Then its, "costs are kept down on needless returns". No regard for the truth at all.

    When people point this out, they tell even more lies, otfen about the person who blew the whistle on them.

    If that doesnt' silence their critics they bring out the personal insult hoping to intimidate them.

    The CT people say they aren't convinced of what the law says? Fine let the live in denial.

    The customers only need enough information to get them started in the right direction. There's plenty of that, thanks to my fellow consumers on this and other site. Oh, and published articles in newspapers and on consumer sites.

    CT is being represented by crack pot liars

    That sums them up pretty well.

  7. #67
    Posted by an unregistered user Angry CT Guy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    933
    Rep Power
    0

    Re: Why Do CT Defenders Post So Many Lies Here?

    Quote Originally Posted by Fed Up Consumer View Post
    These Canadian Tire people are disgusting.

    They tell one lie after another, without regard to the truth - just whatever they feel like saying at the time.

    There lies aren't even very consistent either.

    Returns don't cost us any money, they say repeatedly. Then its, "costs are kept down on needless returns". No regard for the truth at all.

    When people point this out, they tell even more lies, otfen about the person who blew the whistle on them.

    If that doesnt' silence their critics they bring out the personal insult hoping to intimidate them.

    The CT people say they aren't convinced of what the law says? Fine let the live in denial.

    The customers only need enough information to get them started in the right direction. There's plenty of that, thanks to my fellow consumers on this and other site. Oh, and published articles in newspapers and on consumer sites.

    CT is being represented by crack pot liars

    That sums them up pretty well.

    Always amazes me how much this loser says, without saying anything relevant.

    What published articles specifically say CTC's return policies are illegal? Answer: none. Quit being a liar.

    What consumer sites have anything more than peoples opinions....they are entitled to those, but they aren't the law.....lie number two.

    You get called every time because you think your opinion trumps all others.....they don't....you continue to lose.

  8. #68
    Posted by an unregistered user Angry CT Guy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    933
    Rep Power
    0

    Re: Why Do CT Defenders Post So Many Lies Here?

    Whoops....almost forgot....849 customers today....average sale was $49.80....do the math.

  9. #69

    Re: Why Do CT Defenders Post So Many Lies Here?

    I just love it when the stupid CT liars post their lies right here on the "CT Defenders Post Lies" thread.

    It's so much more convenient for any consumers to pick away at.

    Take this batch of lies, for example:

    Quote Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
    quoted from teh CPA, i might suggest looking at the header of the section you found that under. It's called FUTURE CONTRACTS.
    Let's start with the most obvious and easily disproven lie: there is NO SUCH THING in the CPA as a "FUTURE CONTRACT"!

    These dumb CT Liars can't even QUOTE the law accurately, let alone interpret it!

    Just search "Consumer Protection Act, 2002, S.O. 2002, c. 30, Sched. A" for that term - you won't find it.

    Oh, then, gee, where do we find "the section" that talks about "cancelling" or "cancellation"?

    Well, how about we search the REST of the TABLE OF CONTENTS, huh?

    23 - Cancelling future performance agreements"

    I can hear their tiny mental wheels turning: "I'm a CT Liar. Look what I found! I don't need to read any more. I'll just jump right onto CT Sucks, and shoot my mouth off about how wrong everybody else is!"

    But guess what? If you BOTHER to SCROLL DOWN a few lines, you'll find the following sections also cover "Cancel":

    28 - Time Share Agreements
    35 - Personal Development Services
    40 - Internet Agreements
    43 - Direct Agreements
    47 - Remote Agreements

    And here's an interesting one:

    94 - Cancellation.

    Holy Crap! Look at all the stuff the CT Genius managed to miss! And mis-interpret!

    And that's just the friggin' Table of Contents that they couldn't comprehend!

    Quote Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
    Like you agree to have a kitchen installed or house built or something.... and change your mind. you can cancel a FUTURE contract and receive your money back ....
    Well, Bravo, Mr. CT Dumb-ass.

    You've only proven yourself, once more, to be an incompetent liar.

    And how about all the bandwidth the customer-hating CT Liars wasted, complaining about "interpretations" by others?

    Seems pretty ironic now.

    Quote Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
    you can cancel a FUTURE contract and receive your money back.
    Well, at least you managed to get that right. Too bad it's irrelevant - LOL Hilarious!

    Quote Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
    Not one that's already been completed. future contract. drill that into your head, .
    Ha-ha!

    The only thing that needs drilling is YOUR head, CT Liar!

    You might want to check out the rest of the Act, especially Section 94 called "Cancellation", where it talks about (have you guessed it yet???) ..... "Cancellation"!

    Not that I'm going bother 'interpreting' anything for you - there are already 14 reputable sites where that's been done for us.

    Far safer to trust any one of those sites, over the dumb and disreputable CT Liars.

    But you know what? This same lie was already thoroughly disproven, a few weeks ago, in this thread:

    "https://www.canadiantiresucks.net/ca....html#post3618"

    Sound like another one to add to the "Frequent Liars Club".

    Oh, but when you finally get around to reading past the TABLE of CONTENTS, kindly keep your stupid mis-interpretations and lies to yourself.

    It'll be less embarrassing for you, that way.

  10. #70
    Posted by an unregistered user Angry CT Guy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    933
    Rep Power
    0

    Re: Why Do CT Defenders Post So Many Lies Here?

    Quote Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
    I just love it when the stupid CT liars post their lies right here on the "CT Defenders Post Lies" thread.

    It's so much more convenient for any consumers to pick away at.

    Take this batch of lies, for example:



    Let's start with the most obvious and easily disproven lie: there is NO SUCH THING in the CPA as a "FUTURE CONTRACT"!

    These dumb CT Liars can't even QUOTE the law accurately, let alone interpret it!

    Just search "Consumer Protection Act, 2002, S.O. 2002, c. 30, Sched. A" for that term - you won't find it.

    Oh, then, gee, where do we find "the section" that talks about "cancelling" or "cancellation"?

    Well, how about we search the REST of the TABLE OF CONTENTS, huh?

    23 - Cancelling future performance agreements"

    I can hear their tiny mental wheels turning: "I'm a CT Liar. Look what I found! I don't need to read any more. I'll just jump right onto CT Sucks, and shoot my mouth off about how wrong everybody else is!"

    But guess what? If you BOTHER to SCROLL DOWN a few lines, you'll find the following sections also cover "Cancel":

    28 - Time Share Agreements
    35 - Personal Development Services
    40 - Internet Agreements
    43 - Direct Agreements
    47 - Remote Agreements

    And here's an interesting one:

    94 - Cancellation.

    Holy Crap! Look at all the stuff the CT Genius managed to miss! And mis-interpret!

    And that's just the friggin' Table of Contents that they couldn't comprehend!



    Well, Bravo, Mr. CT Dumb-ass.

    You've only proven yourself, once more, to be an incompetent liar.

    And how about all the bandwidth the customer-hating CT Liars wasted, complaining about "interpretations" by others?

    Seems pretty ironic now.



    Well, at least you managed to get that right. Too bad it's irrelevant - LOL Hilarious!



    Ha-ha!

    The only thing that needs drilling is YOUR head, CT Liar!

    You might want to check out the rest of the Act, especially Section 94 called "Cancellation", where it talks about (have you guessed it yet???) ..... "Cancellation"!

    Not that I'm going bother 'interpreting' anything for you - there are already 14 reputable sites where that's been done for us.

    Far safer to trust any one of those sites, over the dumb and disreputable CT Liars.

    But you know what? This same lie was already thoroughly disproven, a few weeks ago, in this thread:

    "https://www.canadiantiresucks.net/ca....html#post3618"

    Sound like another one to add to the "Frequent Liars Club".

    Oh, but when you finally get around to reading past the TABLE of CONTENTS, kindly keep your stupid mis-interpretations and lies to yourself.

    It'll be less embarrassing for you, that way.
    You know with all your wordiness, how about you save every one some time and give just one example, either from these 14 sites (of opinions I gather) or any other credible source that can prove your opinion correct. Unfortunately, you have been unable to do so for soooo long, that it is evident to the odd readers of this joke of a sucks.com site....that it doesn't exist.
    6 years since the last CPA amendment, and still not even ONE example that states CT isn't following the rules.
    Talk about stupid mis-interpretations....you've been living that lie from day one.
    No worries....made huge coin today and didn't even go in.

Page 7 of 25 First ... 5678917 ... Last

Similar Threads

  1. How to post a new thread Tutorial
    By Admin in forum New to this site?
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: December 27th, 2010, 03:39 PM
  2. Replies: 2
    Last Post: January 31st, 2008, 12:00 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions