It looks like the public is backing the courageous steps being taken by Council.
All-party support for pesticide ban: poll
Looks like Crappy Tire is going to be on the wrong side of this issue.
Oh well, as long as their profits don't suffer, I guess they'll sell anything, whether it's legal to be used or not ...
It seems to me that "Moaner 1" (I LOVE that name!) is totally clued out about the pesticide bans going on in BC, and the fact that the sole purpose of the proposed signage would be to inform the public about the ban on the use of cosmetic pesticides in Coquitlam.
His or her ignorance didn't stop them from complaining about the signs, though, or tossing out accusations about people 'making things up'.
They would be well advised to do some background reading before humiliating themselves in the future.
Last edited by Smrt Cnsmr; April 5th, 2012 at 12:41 PM.
Yes, Moaner 1 completely missed the point of the proposed signs, which will remind consumers about the proposed ban on the cosmetic use of pesiticides:
Originally Posted by Owner 1
How could they be soooo wrong, when all the relevant links were provided???
And based on their ignorance, Moaner 1 made a lot of nutty complaints about consumers:
I wonder how they'll try to dodge and weave around that one?
Hmmm .... maybe they'll finally post some of that 'proof' they said they had, about every single warranty offered for every single battery sold by every single retailer in Canada?
Or, just will they just post more ad's for the great bargains at the Red Triangle of Crap?
And remember: "All Sales Are Final at Crappy Tire" ... but there's no 'signage' telling you that!
Last edited by CTH8R; April 5th, 2012 at 02:37 PM.
Oh-oh! Another nasty lawsuit against Crappy Tire!
This one is for their price-fixing scam.
I heard they are being sued for $50 million - for starters, anyway. Plus punitive damages.
The Crappy People aren't gonna like that very much!
Gas price fixing class action commenced in Ontario - MarketWatch
Oh-oh!
The derelect Crappy Tire building in Scarberia (I used to shop there!) might has inspired a proposed Toronto by-law, to hold these irresponsible Crappy Owers to account for the buildings they abandon.
http://www.torontoobserver.ca/2012/0...-on-the-owner/
If the bylaw is passed, the owners could "could face charges or worse" (when did we hear THAT recently, LOL!).
"The owners can ... be .... taken to court, and eventually the city can take the title to the building."
Last edited by CTH8R; April 11th, 2012 at 06:48 PM.
More on that lawsuit:
Lawsuit seeks refund for gas price-fixing victims | CTV News
A representative of the Competition Bureau was on CBC this morning describing the Conspiracy, and how the evidence showed that the corporation was responsible, not just one or two rogue employees.
The Corporation was responsible.
The Corporation was found guilty.
The Corporation was fined.
A representative of the Vancouver CCS backs Coquitlam council on the pesticide bylaw ...
http://m.thenownews.com/svc/wlws.svc...icleId=4085644
A revealing look at the adversarial relationship between dealers and the corporation.
Encroachment concerns: Réal Martineau v Canadian Tire - International Law Office
Interesting infighting.
Last edited by CTH8R; June 30th, 2012 at 06:49 AM.
People don't want their crappy warehouse:
Concerns persist over Canadian Tire proposal for Bolton | www.caledoncitizen.com | Caledon Citizen
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks