Page 3 of 3 First 123
Results 21 to 26 of 26

Thread: canadian tire smythe fredericton sucks

  1. #21

    Re: canadian tire smythe fredericton sucks

    Lots of the usual CT lies, here:

    - Customers claimed that CT treats "treat every customer like a crook".
    - That there's no evidence that CT's policies are contrary to the law in Ontario.
    - CT has "smart businessmen" (LMAO!). Check out Conrad Black's new digs!
    - The CT Reps keeps posting here daily, but it has nothing to do with "making a difference" (LOL!)

    Regarding the policies that are contrary to Ontario law see here:

    Sale of Goods Act
    For the fuller list of CT lies, check out this thread:

    Why Do CT Defenders Post So Many Lies Here?

    (But be sure and check out that 1 lonely BBB site that discussed rescinded legistlation. After all, that's really the only "evidence" that CT has on its side. Oh, and the site about non-defective items, LOL!)

    And always remember:

    - Every other major retailer has superior policies to CT's (at least from a customer's point of view!)
    - "Friends Don't Let Friends Do Business With Canadian Tire" - for all the reasons you'll read on this and other pro-consumer sites.

  2. #22
    Posted by an unregistered user Angry CT Guy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    933
    Rep Power
    0

    Re: canadian tire smythe fredericton sucks

    Quote Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
    Lots of the usual CT lies, here:

    - Customers claimed that CT treats "treat every customer like a crook".
    - That there's no evidence that CT's policies are contrary to the law in Ontario.
    - CT has "smart businessmen" (LMAO!). Check out Conrad Black's new digs!
    - The CT Reps keeps posting here daily, but it has nothing to do with "making a difference" (LOL!)

    Regarding the policies that are contrary to Ontario law see here:

    Sale of Goods Act
    For the fuller list of CT lies, check out this thread:

    Why Do CT Defenders Post So Many Lies Here?

    (But be sure and check out that 1 lonely BBB site that discussed rescinded legistlation. After all, that's really the only "evidence" that CT has on its side. Oh, and the site about non-defective items, LOL!)

    And always remember:

    - Every other major retailer has superior policies to CT's (at least from a customer's point of view!)
    - "Friends Don't Let Friends Do Business With Canadian Tire" - for all the reasons you'll read on this and other pro-consumer sites.
    Other consumer sites? Like this one:
    Problem with Canadian Tire and their NOMA products [Archive] - RedFlagDeals.com Forums
    DavidLer not getting the consensus he was looking for there either.
    Or this one :
    *UPDATED* Future shop wont exchange a broken product with reciept less than 30 days [Archive] - RedFlagDeals.com Forums
    Not getting it here either.

    Maybe the faker advocates can pool their resources (won't take much given their limited number...lol) and contact the ministry to clarify the situation....or have Ellen Roseman expose these illegal policies....or start a class action suit to quash these apparent illegal return policies once and for all....LMAO

    Or

    You can continue to lie to consumers because you like to.

  3. #23
    Posted by an unregistered user CT Me / Lawguy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Posts
    494
    Rep Power
    0

    Re: canadian tire smythe fredericton sucks

    Well there you have it folks, PROOF 100% that one of your own "Advocates" is actually a liar and a crooked consumer. Buy an item, put an old one in the box and return it as defective using the receipt of the new one.

    I don't care HOW you slice it, that's wrong. In fact, by the letter of the law, it's fraud!

    DavidLER you have been caught red(flagdeals)handed lying, and offering advice for consumers to cheat stores. This is the type of 'advocate' you are. This is the type of person you are. Dirty, underhanded and quite frankly fraudulant and criminal. Hang your head LER, you should be ashamed



    Consumers: Decide for yourself if this is the type of behavious you want to emulate

  4. #24

    Re: canadian tire smythe fredericton sucks

    Regarding the NOMA thread, you seem to have stumbled onto links to the "archive" version of RFD.

    However, you really need to put in the extra effort, and look at the original verson (not the archived version).

    You will see right away that the text you are looking at was, written by an earlier poster. It was that other poster


    Regarding the coffee maker, there's a big discussion about the laws around re-buying and then returning a defective item. Obviously, there's an element of deception involved, and this was freely admitted. But there's been no evidence that this is "fraud".

    Feel free to substantiate you claim of "fraud", though. It would be interesting to hear your justification.


    So, was anyone "caught lying"? No.

    Was anyone a "crooked customer"? No.

    Did anyone do anything wrong? No.

    Was anyone "fraudulant" or "criminal"? No.

    Wrong again, CT Liars. Nice try, though.

  5. #25
    Posted by an unregistered user Angry CT Guy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    933
    Rep Power
    0

    Re: canadian tire smythe fredericton sucks

    Quote Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
    Regarding the NOMA thread, you seem to have stumbled onto links to the "archive" version of RFD.

    However, you really need to put in the extra effort, and look at the original verson (not the archived version).

    You will see right away that the text you are looking at was, written by an earlier poster. It was that other poster


    Regarding the coffee maker, there's a big discussion about the laws around re-buying and then returning a defective item. Obviously, there's an element of deception involved, and this was freely admitted. But there's been no evidence that this is "fraud".

    Feel free to substantiate you claim of "fraud", though. It would be interesting to hear your justification.


    So, was anyone "caught lying"? No.

    Was anyone a "crooked customer"? No.

    Did anyone do anything wrong? No.

    Was anyone "fraudulant" or "criminal"? No.

    Wrong again, CT Liars. Nice try, though.
    Deception? But not Fraud?

    Fraud Meaning and Definition

    Here you go you rather thick loser. No wonder you post under anonymous here and under DavidLer on other sites. Your lack of credibility and lying would make you a nobody on Redflags as well.

  6. #26
    Senior Member CTH8R's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    5,320
    Blog Entries
    1
    Rep Power
    12

    Re: canadian tire smythe fredericton sucks

    Interesting link, on the huge difference between "deception" and "faud" in legal sense.

    Which is lucky for the Crappy People, who are very busy doing both!

Page 3 of 3 First 123

Similar Threads

  1. Fredericton, Oromocto, Fredericton North canadian tires
    By Guest-0070 in forum New Brunswick
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: November 17th, 2010, 08:33 AM
  2. **Canadian Tire Financial Services sucks as an employer**
    By Guest-0017 in forum Employees Speak Out
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: April 4th, 2010, 02:48 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions