CT Challenger
New member
nobody said a refund is the only course for a defect, ct owner/liar.
only that the customer can rescind (cancel) the sales contract (transaction) due to a misrepresentation by the store that the product is of merchantable quality (i.e., the store represented the product as being free of defects).
ct owner/liar are proven wrong over and over
Do you have any proof that the Canadian Tire stores have purposefully misrepresented what they were selling....cause you hit the nail on the head with that one....it has to be a deliberate misrepresentation.
another typical ct lie and misrepresentation
nobody ever said it had to be purposeful or deliberate
you are just putting words in people mouths that they never said
then pretending youve scored some kind of victory
by proving something is wrong - but they never said it
liar
too bad than nobody is buying into (get it?) your ct bs
plus cpa doesnt say it has to be purposeful or deliberate
check out part iii - unfair practices
examples of misrepresentations
A representation that the goods or services are of a particular .... quality ... if they are not.
if the box says it is a pressure washer with 1200 psi and it wont even spray water then it is being misrepresented
the retailer isnt asked to test every unit
but if the customer gets it home and it wont spray water then they can rescind the contract and are entitled to a refund
why are you still debating this?
worried about all those 'horrible' pressure washers youve been selling - worried that people will start demanding their rights?
worried youll have to start following the law instead of telling lies about it?
you ct liars dont deserve to have the word canadian in your store name
red triangle of crap