"Repair Only Warranty" - No Refund, No Exchange

[Smart Consumner]

the store does not have the option to sell or not sell the items

the store does not enter into an agreement with the manufacturer.

the corporation does this on behalf of all stores.

the store has to stock the items that are advertised.

Boy, you sure do seem to know a lot about the inner workings of a canadian tire store!

actually i know sweet fuck all about the inner workings of a canadian tire store.

Boy, you sure do have a lot to say on a subject you know SFA about!


Then again, that's been your history all along. Lots to say, SFA to back it up.

i know plenty about the inner workings of the legal system specifically as it relates to consumer law and the rights of consumers and sellers.

Funny - this seems to be yet another of the many areas in which you know sweet f*ck all!

I haven't read everything from ct-me postings but he seems to understand the business and the financial aspects quite well

Sounds like buness and finance also needs to be added to your SFA list!

just my two cents

With inflation, that also is worth exactly SFA.

[CT Challenger]

the store does not have the option to sell or not sell the items and the store does not enter into an agreement with the manufacturer. the corporation does this on behalf of all stores. the store has to stock the items that are advertised.

I don't care whether the store made the stupid arrangement, or the corporation made the stupid arrangement.

Walmart and Costco don't let their suppliers push them around like scared little school girls.

As the customer, I just want them to sell me something that works, and give me my money back if it doesn't. The store owner and the corporation all need to get their ducks in a row & fix this, and not try to dump it in my lap to deal with.

Plus trying to disguise the whole thing as a "warranty" issue - right up until the customer drags the crap back to the store, then gets the big surprise on "no refund, no exchange".

[Angry CT Guy]

I am a dealer, and that's why I know so much about the inner workings of a CTC store. I only got involved because much of the information given by posters such as DavidLer is simply not true, but his interpretation. That's why he can't list any lawsuits against Canadian Tire's "illegal" return policy....it's simple....it's not illegal.
There are actually some half decent complaints on this site that I use to ensure my employees don't go down the same path, but when info is given that just doesn't ring true, even from a common sense point of view....I like to add some perspective.

[CT Challenger]

Let's do a quick review of the lovely Unregistered, and her recent post (i.e. those not under the "CT Me" or "lawguy" names), to see just how truthful she can be.

How about this one, from March 2nd on the EVOLVE TREADMILL thread:

...nor do I even work for Canadian tire.

But then today we read:

I am a dealer

She lies.

She's a CT employee.

Pretty much the same difference, don't you agree?

Just one more piece of Bull Shit to add to the growing pile spouted by CT ME, LawGuy and Unregistered (who all appear to be the one and the same).

[Smart Consumer]

i called a local canadian tire, said that i'd purchased a....wait for it....simoniz electric pressure washer and needed the warranty details faxed to my office. they did so right away. here's the very first line in the document further proof that your claim of zero help, zero return as soon as you pay is what i like to call......wrong.

So, help us unravel your web of lies.

Since you have finally confessed to actually working for Canadian Tire (one of your longer-running lie, I think), we must revisit your relevant claims.

Did you actually telephone another store and lie to them about purchasing a pressure washer?

Or, did you lie to us when you said you telephoned another store? (Because, after all, you are a dealer at a store, so you would not need to call anyone.)

Also, why did you ask for a warranty for an electric pressure washer? Surely you knew that they did not have the "Repair Only" (no refund, no exchange) policy. Did you pick these in an attempt to deceive readers who would not spot the difference?

Were you, in essense, lying to the readers on this forum? (By pretending that there isn't a no-refund/no-exchange policy for pressure washers, when in fact there is such a policy, but for gas-powered washers?)

How about your lie about DavidLer? You claimed that he was wrong (by pretending he was describing only electric washers) when all along he was right about some pressure washers. A fact you chose to conceal. To advance another of your lies.

Please help us decipher your web of lies.

On second though, don't bother.

It's quicker to just disregard every self-serving statement you've written.

[HandyMan]

aint hard ta spot the posts whats got lies innum.

just look fer the names lawguy, or that unregistered fella likes to use lotsa dots, like this here .......

acts like he just wants to set the record strait for the better good of all concerned.

turns out he, maybe she, just wants ta rake in more cash at the till.

[Guest-0276]

A CT dealer lying, there's a surprise. Their stores suck so bad that they have to lie about how good they are. Next thing you'll know they'll start selling defective bikes to kids, start ripping off seniors who bring their cars in, and have a sale on defective pressure washers. There's no telling how low they will go. Looks like CT Me's split into lawguy and unregistered.

[CT Challenger]

So, help us unravel your web of lies.

On second though, don't bother.

It's quicker to just disregard every self-serving statement you've written.

I think the original message was actually posted by lawguy, even though he/she used the name Unregistered.

I saw a similar clarification over on the Evolve Treadmill thread.

On the other hand, lawguy seems to be a liar as well - just not as busy.

For instance, why did LawGuy ask for the warranty on an electric pressure washer?

There was no mention of electric vs. gas in the "Simoniz Scam" or "CT Doesn't Honor" thread, except regarding snow blowers. In the Evolve Treadmill thread, it was Unregistered and lawguy who first mentioned electric.

So, why DID lawguy decide to pretend that DavidLer had claimed that electric pressure washers had the horrid "repair only" policy?

Why tell a lie that could be so easily disproven?

Besides, it was the original posters who claimed that their washers were subject to the "policy", in the "Simoniz Scam" thread. Not even in the Evolve Treadmill thread, to which lawguy was replying.

Should we instead start calling him "LieGuy"?

[Guest-0276]

I am a dealer, and that's why I know so much about the inner workings of a CTC store. I only got involved because much of the information given by posters such as DavidLer is simply not true, but his interpretation. That's why he can't list any lawsuits against Canadian Tire's "illegal" return policy....it's simple....it's not illegal.
.

Hey shit for brains cockaroach. Care to make a large bet on that one?

[Angry CT Guy]

Wow, I posted twice and now I'm every poster. Me thinks this board has become a haven for the crazed. With that, I'm out. I'll leave it to the "experts" to right the wrongs of the world, however misguided their efforts appear to be. Just remember this, if what you say is true, then I should be worried. I gave you reasons why I'm not. The posts I've read are inaccurate, one-sided, and untrue. If you don't believe me, then sue. Like I said, not worried.