V
verogionet
Guest
Got a quote from the automotive departement for my car. Ended up more $$$$ and they refused to honor their quote! I will never go back there.
Got a quote from the automotive departement for my car. Ended up more $$$$ and they refused to honor their quote! I will never go back there.
Wow, Consumers!
The self-appointed CT Rep actually admitting that the Consumer Protection Act actually applies to them! Very novel indeed!
Usually they just say that it only applies to Remote Agreements. Or only to Future Performance Agreements. Or, only to agreements between businesses.
So, some progress really IS being made!!!
Wrong thread, again, CT moron.
https://www.canadiantiresucks.net/g...plaints-chat/707-sale-goods-act.html#post2400
Have a look there for the examples ("repair only" and "exchange only" policies) that contravene the laws (not "rules").
Happy reading!
You still seem to be on the wrong thread.
Just sayin'.
Hint: click this link!!!!! ------>>>> https://www.canadiantiresucks.net/general-canadian-tire-complaints-chat/707-sale-goods-act.html
Be sure to check out all the examples. Lots of good references.
Of course, calling the Ministry is an even better idea for consumers.
Oh, and you might also want to stop by Jump Start, and tell them about their Donate button and credit card requirement, and how that makes them "Faker Advocates", just like Canadian Tire Sucks Forum - Canadian Tire Sucks Portal.
I'm sure they'll be glad to read your identical posts, day after day too, LOL!
- Still the wrong thread.
- Still lots of lies from the self-appointed CT Rep.
- Jump Start is still yet another "Faker Advocate" site run by the Faker Advocates at CT, at least by their definition.
- Still the wrong thread.
- Stil two exampes in the SOG thread: "repair only" and "exchange only". Oh, wait: three examples: "No Warranty".
- Still no specifics on lies by consumers, and no evidence against them.
- Still lots of lies from the self-appointed CT Rep.
- Jump Start is still yet another "Faker Advocate" site run by the Faker Advocates at CT, according to the CT definition.
Still the wrong thread.
Plus, some typical CT lies:
- There’s no evidence that this site is affiliated with any other “sucks.com” site.
- No consumer has written that any retailer has been “found” (in any official way) to have an illegal policy” – only that CT has 3 policies that contravene laws in Ontario.