CT Challenger
New member
Hmm. Another reference to lame-o Wikipedia, and some more insults.
Not very interesting, I'm afraid.
What I didn't see, were any examples (not even a description!) of anybody being convicted of "fraud" for using a receipt from a new item to return an old, unopened item.
No examples from your store (assuming you have one).
None from any store at all!
Still no evidence on conviction rates, I see. Are you sure really sure the "conviction rate is 100%"?
And still no evidence to support your claim that any deception is 'automatically' a crime of fraud.
Finally, still no evidence that someone posting here did something that meets all five separate elements of fraud (especially "injury").
Seems you don't have anything to back up your claims at all, LOL!
Well, don't sweat it. Everyone here already knows you're full of crap.
That's why you have to resort to sophmoric taunts about 'mental illness' and 'booze'.
Come back when you've got something relevant to say on the topic of ID and personal information.
Not very interesting, I'm afraid.
What I didn't see, were any examples (not even a description!) of anybody being convicted of "fraud" for using a receipt from a new item to return an old, unopened item.
No examples from your store (assuming you have one).
None from any store at all!
Still no evidence on conviction rates, I see. Are you sure really sure the "conviction rate is 100%"?
And still no evidence to support your claim that any deception is 'automatically' a crime of fraud.
Finally, still no evidence that someone posting here did something that meets all five separate elements of fraud (especially "injury").
Seems you don't have anything to back up your claims at all, LOL!
Well, don't sweat it. Everyone here already knows you're full of crap.
That's why you have to resort to sophmoric taunts about 'mental illness' and 'booze'.
Come back when you've got something relevant to say on the topic of ID and personal information.