You bet i'll chime in with a rebuttal
Everything and anythign related to transmission will NOT, absolutely positively NOT cause white smoke to come out of the exhaust pipe!
so let's have DavidLER, law expert turning auto expert have some sort of diagnostic
I didn't say the smoke was due to the transmission oil. The smoke was because the mechanic overfilled the engine oil -- and they admitted that fault, because it was too obvious to ignore. They also admitted the transmission oil was low (they claim 1 litre down, but we saw them pour two brand new 985 ml bottles down there so it was likely more than 1.7 L down -- why did they have to lie about that?!). But they claim no knowledge of how the transmission oil could have been lowered.
I told them I suspected the same mechanic accidentally drained the oil thinking i was going to do the flush and simply forgot to replace what he'd drained, but they denied that possibility despite acknowledging the mechanic did make a mistake with the engine oil overfill.
Either way, where the low transmission oil was concerned, they (1) claimed that 1 L down was nothing, would not have damaged the transmission line at all, and (2) as mentioned above, they just topped up the oil without checking for burns or leaks.
I reckon they didn't want to take the time & expense to check out the transmission line & burn smell properly because (1) it's time they're not earning money, and (2) if they did find a fault, it's an expensive fix to claim responsibility for.
The reason we went back 2 more times for follow up fixes was because it turns out the O-ring was burned out from the heat, so transmission oil had started to leak at the bottom. They finally had to change the gasket too. These components were all fine before the car went in for the oil change. All the trouble started after the car came out of the pit stop -- the common denominator here is CT. But they say the gasket & O-ring is a result of rust damage. They refuse to go down the "burnt transmission line" route.
But I have checked with online car forums, and the replies have all come back that 1 L down would definitely have damaged the transmission and decreased the transmission life by a lot. It will be damage that I have to pay for down the line, and all agree CT should be responsible to replace the damaged tarnsmission. This is where the stalemate is.
One more thing -- it's not like I was cheap and didn't want to do a transmission flush. I didn't have the 1 hour time to do it and said I'd do it another time. The whole point of using the Pit Stop was to get in and out in 20 minutes, because I was very busy that whole week because I have work to do. Turns out I lost even more time having to handle the car problems and keep going back.
To the CT mechanics who go on this forum to dismiss folks' concerns and spew negative remarks, all I can say is "Shame on You" for not even being able to be objective and provide constructive advice. Everyone makes mistakes, and in this case, the mechanic was definitely at fault (this was his 2nd write-up and three strikes he'll be out, according to the foreman).
So just because he has a certificate like you do obviously doesn't mean diddly squat! Certification does not always equal competence & honesty & integrity!!