CT Me / Lawguy
Posted by an unregistered user
well clearly thats a retarded joke. lol thanks for the laugh.
look dude, whoever you are, whatever you do, i simply don't care. please understand that fully. you're a guy on your end of the internet, i'm a guy on my end of the internet. i don't know if the problem is that your ego is too big, that you have been misinformed by someone else which could include the consumer advocate websites youve pointed out, which for the record may not be 100% correct all the time or that you are insecure and can't acccept that you have erred i your assesssment of the law. there's nothing more to it. you've looked in all the right places, you've cross referenced different acts and laws, in fact you've done all the research that i would and have done many times in dealing with consumer law. law is very very very gray. if it wasn't, OJ Simpson would not have walked free on murder.
in reading the details, often vague, of said laws, i don't know how else i can put this except that you simply misunderstand in consumer law which contracts are valid depending on the type of transaction such as retail over the counter, order for future delivery and purchasing a service as well as when and who's warranties apply. i'm not here to make you look bad, i stumbled upon this site, did some reading and thought i'd pitch into an area that had clearly been steered off course.
you can spend the rest of your day copying and pasting links that you've posted multiple times but it will not change the fact that what is contained in those links must be assessed correctly for them to carry any weight, and you assessed them incorrectly. so before you get your knickers in a knot, understand that i am on your side. as i mentioned, i deal in consumer law, more often then not defending clients who have been wronged by a seller who has broken the law. what you are workign with here, is not canadian tire breaking any laws. sorry man, i hate to be the bearer of bad news, but it's reality
look dude, whoever you are, whatever you do, i simply don't care. please understand that fully. you're a guy on your end of the internet, i'm a guy on my end of the internet. i don't know if the problem is that your ego is too big, that you have been misinformed by someone else which could include the consumer advocate websites youve pointed out, which for the record may not be 100% correct all the time or that you are insecure and can't acccept that you have erred i your assesssment of the law. there's nothing more to it. you've looked in all the right places, you've cross referenced different acts and laws, in fact you've done all the research that i would and have done many times in dealing with consumer law. law is very very very gray. if it wasn't, OJ Simpson would not have walked free on murder.
in reading the details, often vague, of said laws, i don't know how else i can put this except that you simply misunderstand in consumer law which contracts are valid depending on the type of transaction such as retail over the counter, order for future delivery and purchasing a service as well as when and who's warranties apply. i'm not here to make you look bad, i stumbled upon this site, did some reading and thought i'd pitch into an area that had clearly been steered off course.
you can spend the rest of your day copying and pasting links that you've posted multiple times but it will not change the fact that what is contained in those links must be assessed correctly for them to carry any weight, and you assessed them incorrectly. so before you get your knickers in a knot, understand that i am on your side. as i mentioned, i deal in consumer law, more often then not defending clients who have been wronged by a seller who has broken the law. what you are workign with here, is not canadian tire breaking any laws. sorry man, i hate to be the bearer of bad news, but it's reality