CT Challenger
New member
It's important to remember that the customer didn't return one item with the receipt from another - you are still wrong about that.
Thanks for the interesting links, though.
But there's nothing in there about it being 'fraud' to return an unopened item that was purchased recently with the receipt from an item that was purchased earlier. Sorry.
It is interesting how all the examples they gave involve a loss to the store - something that won't happen in the hypothetical case you are describing.
It's good to see you've finally taken the time to post an actual definition of "fraud", instead of your own "deception - fraud" B.S.
You may have noted that someone has to get something they aren't entitled to.
According to your "theory", what would a person gain (and the store lose), if the newer, unopened item was returned instead of the older, unopened item?
Just curious if you have any basis at all for your "theory" and "opinion".
Also, we're still waiting for all those criminal cases, for all those people you wrote were convicted of fraud for this. Any time soon would be fine.
So, do you have anything that backs up your claim that it's somehow "fraud" and "theft" to returning an older, unopened item with the receipt from a newer purchase?
(Not that anyone we're discussing has every said they did that!)
Or, would you like to simply admit that you are wrong? Again, that is.