Nope, this isn't the right thread, either, CT moron.
Try this one instead, for the examples of "Repair Only" and "Exchange Only" - lots of convincing evidence to be found there:
https://www.canadiantiresucks.net/general-canadian-tire-complaints-chat/707-sale-goods-act.html
You might also be interest in the the Jump Start site - according to the CT Rep, it's also a "faker advocate" site - you might be interested in sharing your insights over there, too.
Convincing evidence? Don't you think someone would have used it by now, if it was convincing? But you can't find one (1) example where CT or ANY other retailer has been acused of having an illegal policy....not even 1....and with 6 years for the CPA and many more for Sale of Goods Act......yep, pretty obvious....you're a liar.
Nice try though.....liar.
Once again, the self-appointed CT Rep's post only vague accusations. Yup, they aren't very good at specifics, LOL.
Plus, they are still posting on the wrong thread, LOL!
Let's not forget the signature hypocrisy of the CT rep's.
They act like it's bad when someone else's site has a "donate" button and asks for credit card information.
But somehow they don't want to apply their own defintion to Jump Start, which requires (not just asks) for a credit card.
So typical of the ct liars and hypocrites.
How many stanardad lies are we up to now? 23 or 24?
Still digging at a charity you loser? You're a real class act buddy, real classy!
Donate here means someone running a business gets the money, which is just fine...but don't be fooled.
Donate at JumpStart and you just helped a kid get involved in sports in Canada and 100% of the funds are used....not just a percentage. You tell me what the difference is
One day you or your kid might need assistance of some sort from some charity.... then you might realize how much of an asshole, a real true asshole it takes to even consider posting something degrading about a charity organization.
Well, consumers, we are being lied about yet again. And insulted, of course.
Make no mistake, no consumers have written anything on the topic of charities vs. for-profits, and none of us wrote anything bad about Jump Start.
This is a standard CT tactic, when things are going against them.
No, consumers have only pointed out that Jump Start fits the CT Rep's own definition of "Faker Advocate Site" - in fact, it's an even better fit than CTS, with the credit card info. being required. Oh, and of course the "Donate" button.
Be sure and check out the CT Rep's definition from May, along with the countless repetitions of "Donate button". Yup, Jump Start is an excellent match for their own definition of "Faker Advocate Site".
So, why do the CT Defenders post so many lies here?
Maybe it's to distract consumers from the real issues at hand.
Like the poor way they treat consumers, for example.
Of their terrible policies - like the ones that are contrary to the SGA and CPA - "repair only" and "exchange only". Lots of proof, for consumers who are intersted in looking into it.
The self-appointed CT Rep is very entertaining.
For instance, they insist that only a few people read this site, yet they post here many times a day.
They insist that consumers post incorrect information, yet they can't seem to refute it.
They claim to have "proof", yet all they post are guesses, speculation and lies.
They claim that consumers post "lies" here, yet they are never specific, and never offer any evidence.
They say they run a store that depends on consumers for their survival, yet lie about consumers and insult them.
They say they are "very versed" and "quite versed" in the law, yet the mis-quote and mis-interpret the laws regularly.
Yes, it is all very entertaining to watch.
But much more informative to simply read what other consumers have written, and learn from them.
Yes, consumers would be very interested to see the "ample evidence" that refute any claims on this site.
However, there simply isn't any, which explains why the CT rep's have only lies and insults to post here.
Don't forget that "Jump Start" is also a "Faker Advocate Site", according to the CT rep's own definition.
Also be sure to check out the list of dozens of lies the CT rep routines posts on this site.
Well, the CT Liar has been at it again – no surprise there.
In addition to the usual insults directed at their customer base, the CT Liar has posted a few routine lies about what consumers wrote:
- The lie that consumers have been posting negative comments about Jump Start (or even anything about charities in general).
- The lie that consumers claimed to have links to ‘findings’ regarding the illegality of CT’s policies.
- The usual vague claims that consumer posted some lies or other, without any specifics or evidence.
- Some vague claims about other web sites, including claims that a particular person owns CT Sucks.
Also, when the CT Liar gets proven wrong, they tend to post lies about what the CT Liar previously wrote. In particular, that there is “ample evidence” to support their claims, when really there is next to nothing, and the "Faker Advocates" are not defined as having "Donate" buttons, and needing credit card information.
Plus, the usual re-telling of standard lies already documented on this thread:
CT Law Lie #8 – A customer is not entitled to an exchange on a “Repair Only” product.
CT Law Lie #9 - A customer is not entitled to a refund for a “Repair Only” or “Exchange Only” product.
CT Lie #24 – The CPA describes retailer obligations regarding the ‘express’ warranties provided by manufacturers.
Of course, it makes no sense at all that they would spend so much effort trying to fool people who are NOT customers, into giving up their rights.
Yes, the self appointed CT Rep is a strange creature indeed.
And we are already shopping Walmart, Costco, Home Depot - anybody except CT. And we are taking everybody we can reach with us, too.
It makes no sense that a non-customer of CT would spend so much effort trying to convince an owner of a store that they don't shop, that he was wrong about something.
Oh, so it's ok for the self-appointed CT Rep to tell all the lies they want, as long as the people they are lying to or about, are NOT their customers.
Yup a very interesting view of ethics, and right or wrong.
Well, I'm glad they are showing their true lying selves on here, and I hope they never clue in that some of the viewers on this site might just be actual customers.
I'm sure that their abysmal lack of honesty would open a few customers eyes, LOL.
Oh, and it's nice of them to offer up a few more lies on this recent post, including this claim that the opinion of experts are only those of consumers (Lie #23, I think).
Of course, it makes no sense at all that they would spend so much effort trying to fool people who are NOT customers, into giving up their rights.
Yes, the self appointed CT Rep is a strange creature indeed.
And we are already shopping Walmart, Costco, Home Depot - anybody except CT. And we are taking everybody we can reach with us, too.
Well, the CT Liar hasn't been especially busy with lies this weekend. Maybe there was nice summer weather?
As usual, there were lies about what consumers had written, like pretending consumers wrote about manufacturer's warranties, instead of the implied warranty from the CPA that retailers have to abide by (and which their 'repair only', 'exchange only' and "no warranty' policies violate).
Plus, there were the usual denials about the laws in Ontario (and elsewhere):
CT Lie #8 – A customer is not entitled to an exchange on a “Repair Only” product.
CT Lie #9 - A customer is not entitled to a refund for a “Repair Only” or “Exchange Only” product.
CT Lie #22 – There are only a few people who have the opinion and interpretation that Ontario consumers are entitled to a refund or exchange for a defective item. None of those people are reliable.
Over all, a fairly quiet Sunday, LOL!