Actionable in court? oh here we go again. LOL
I see you've stopped calling it an ILLEGAL policy
And I see you've once again misrepresented a simple statement (Jerk!)
The question was, can HD sue a person (such as yourself) for making libelous claims on a forum such as this?
It did not (and I think you know this, jerk) have anything to do with the Repair Only Policy.
... after being buried on that claim, now it's just a horrible policy.
Nice misrepresenation, Jerk. You know perfectly well that by calling it "horrible", that does not mean it has somehow, in the background, magically become legal.
There has been an abundance of evidence presented here, that your devious, dispicable and HORRIBLE policy is contrary to the CPA, due to ..... (wait for it) ... "misrepresentation" (something you seem to do obsessively).
And, based on the definition provided here by alleged owners like yourself, is .... (wait for it) .... "Illegal".
Jerk!
... I suspect you never actually put this to the test as I did again this morning.
Frankly, I'm really not intersted in what you may have done this morning. I hope it wasn't ... .illegal. Ewww!
But we have many other consumers who report getting resolution in court, or simply by threatening to sue.
Too bad the words is getting out!
Sorry dude, your snowblower that you used all winter and is 7 months old, can't be returned to any retailer. It goes to be repaired under warranty.
Gee, maybe you should have bought it at Costo, LOL!
Because somehow they can still make money, without screwing people over the way you do!