Yep, all lies.....like there is no 600 sucks.com sites, covering every major retailer, restaurant and corporations.
Oh, no! More lies!
And the CT rep's were doing so well with keeping their (assuming there are more that one of them) number of lies down, too. Oh, well. Back to their (or his/her) old tricks again. So disappointing!
Nobody said there are "no 600 sucks.com sites". Typical CT lie.
(But I'm sure the owners appreciate your "donation" by way of your posting and any resulting site traffic.)
Just google sucks.com to find out the truth.
Sure, whatever. As long as we all agree that CT sucks.
Not one example of any credible source saying Canadian Tire has an illegal return policy....don't believe me, then try and find one.
You know, just because you aren't convinced by the evidence already presented, that doesn't mean that it's a lie. Duh!
When someone calls me a liar (lame insults), then I like to call them on their own lies...
Um, the definition of "liar" is making a statement you know isn't true.
For instance, suggesting that someone wrote, "there is no 600 sucks.com sites", when you know that they didn't, is a lie.
So, you are a liar. Check and mate. Not an insult. Not lame. Just a statement of fact.
You are just another (assuming there are more than one) CT Liar.
oh yeah, and mention what a loser they are.
See, talk about lame insults! Seems to be your default behaviour, when you can't think of another lie to tell.
... Now, I know the following doesn't have anything to do with CT's "Repair Only" policy or anything, but I can't help but be curious about your bizarre conspiracy theory:
Faker advocates on fake advocate sites would not need my credit card info,
Do you maybe mean "
Real advocates on
real advocate sites
would not need my credit card info?".
Or maybe you mean, "
Faker advocates on
fake advocate sites
would need my credit card info."?
At least be coherent in your paranoid babblings.
Just curious: do you perhaps think the End Of Days going to be May 21st?
Oh, and by the way? This site does not "need" your credit card info.
Another lie. You really do seem to have, shall we say, 'only a passing relationship with reality'.
... would not have a disclaimer to the merchantability of this site and wouldn't be looking for donations.
Huh? Why not? Seems pretty reasonable, if you think about it for 30 second.
Lots of advocacy sites have disclaimers just like that. Red Flag Deals. Complaints.com. Unac.org. Other information web sites. ComplaintsBoard has a disclaimer, too.
So, what's your beef, exactly? Why should this particular site be different, LOL?
... and wouldn't be looking for donations.
Lots of advocacy sites ask for donations. Cleft pallet advocates. Literacy advocates. Anti-poverty advocates. Affordable housing advocates. The list goes on.
Yup, that Google thing you suggested sure does turn up a lot of advocates looking for donatons!
I guess they all must be "faker advocates", huh? LOL hilarious!
So, what's your beef, exactly? Why should this particular site be different?
Common sense prevails yet again.
The one thing your posts lack, more than anything else, is 'common sense'.
Just my opinon, though. But based on a LOT of evidence!