CT Me / Lawguy
Posted by an unregistered user
what value would proving my occupation provide to this forum? zero
makes you wonder why DavidLer and his Unregistered posts keep calling black as white.
the paranoid delusions continue
soon she'ill be shooting at the mailman thinking its davidler coming to read her mind again
tinfoil hats just arent going to cut it after a while
plus the irony of unregistered compaining about people who post as .... unregistered
hypocrite
and still no verifiable evidence to back up any claims by ctme lawguy or you know who
black really is white in the psychedelic worlds that the ct defenders inhabit
1) davidler claims that a repair warranty is ILLEGAL for goods purchased in Canada - check , no dispute to be had
2) davidler claims that only canadian tire offers the repairs, everyone else replaces - check
so i addressed it with this information
deceptive as usual
nobody claimed that any kind of warranty was illegal - just the no refund policy is illegal for defective goods
deceptive as usual
nobody claimed that any kind of warranty was illegal - just the no refund policy is illegal for defective goods
nobody claimed anything about good in canada - just in ontario and some talk of other provinces
nobody claimed anything about other stores not offering repairs
nobody claimed that all other stores replaced
i could go on but its getting boring
maybe you really just too dumb to comprehend
you wrote a bunch of lies and then failed to disprove them
congrats
thanks for another round of the game of LiarGuy though
8, A few days before court I get my money back plus a gift card.
I keep my money but donate the gift card. Not a good store.
So what should the poor customer do when they're denied a refund within the prescribed time line, with a receipt etc, contrary to CPA.
Should they suck it and leave their wallet behind as CT, lawguy and other CT toadies would want or waste time and file with small claims court?.
ct is the only one that has an illegal policy where the prescribed time is zero days and its disguised as a 'warranty' term
that's exactly what they want you to do
and theyll blame the victim in the process
So what should the poor customer do when they're denied a refund within the prescribed time line, with a receipt etc, contrary to CPA. Should they suck it and leave their wallet behind as CT, lawguy and other CT toadies would want or waste time and file with small claims court?
It doesn't seem like CT leaves a lot of options.
CT's latest financials: Stock Price up 18% in 2010, Dividend Increase of 31%.
Untrue. Walmart made me deal with Fuji for a defective camera. They would not deal with it at the store.
I recently had a bad experience with Canadian Tire in Quebec as they refuse refund for pressure washer. It simply didn't work. What they offer me was a store credit that I had to use on the spot. I didn't accept it as I want my money back as:
1, the store was very difficult to deal with,
2, the store treat me very badly I told them my bad experiences with the defect. They accuse me of breaking it, using it and returning it like they were a rental store etc.
3, they told me they don't make it and it's under warranty, "go bug them!"
4, they made me stand in line for over an hour before dealing with my situation. The manager said he couldn't do it and neither would the GM. I took David's advice and contacted the ministry for advice and went back to the store for another try at refund. I told them, the manager and the GM it's contrary to CPA and I would file a complaint with the ministry and file a claim in small claims court.
5, they told me go ahead, and leave the store
6, Once they got the court notice did they offer to refund my money moins a $100 restocking fee.
7, I reject the offer and said I will proceed with a bigger claim for aggravation
8, A few days before court I get my money back plus a gift card.
I keep my money but donate the gift card. Not a good store.